sci.physics
- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 783 June 30, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi,
Sam Wormley
- Thoughts on why space must have three dimensions,
Neil
- "Examining Mathematical Approaches",
Dlo
- Is there a relationship between optical band gap and activation energy?,
JAH
- electrostatic,
Ludo
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 81: Sir Isaac and Leibniz Come Out Ahead of Fermat in Nonrenormalization Exponentiation,
OsherD
- Which version of it? :-),
Math Freak
- Twenty Five minutes? :-),
Math Freak
- Job opening for physics outreach,
Clint Sprott
- Porous materials can have unusual properties,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Squeezin' Balls in Those Hallowed Halls -- Oh, My Achin' Testacles!,
donstockbauer
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 80: 1 + y - x Conversion of QM E = hv,
OsherD
- Principle of greatest time,
gmarkowsky
- How Refrigerators Work,
W. Watson
- Re: Consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys _Everything_.,
T Wake
- Re: Stop the "1 degree temperature increase" LIE. Stop psychopathically Lying!,
Rene Tschaggelar
- "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light",
Dlo
- Re: WTC explosion-plume TRAJECTORY -- 911,
LarryG
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79.1: Superposition, Phases, Linearity As A Causal "Boundary Value Problem",
OsherD
- method to sort semiconductor carbon nanotubes by size,
Sam Wormley
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79: Superposition, Phases, Linearity As A Causal "Boundary Value Problem",
OsherD
- Study Shows San Andreas Primed for Major Quake,
Sam Wormley
- A Hydrogen Suitcase,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Some advice on table I made..,
Martin Hogbin
- Pulse Function,
Martin
- Re: How find focal length of lens at home?,
Greg Hansen
- Emotional Forces?,
platopes
- Non Contact (Optical) Pyrometer & Exhaust Gas Temperature,
mrmain
- Electric force and charge,
JoeT
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79: Superposition, Phases, Linearity,
OsherD
- Quantum Bomb - x-dimensional harmonic oscillator zero point energy of a vortex,
switzerland qunatium computer
- GPS TRACKS EARTH'S INSTANTANEOUS POLE,
Sam Wormley
- atmospheric pressures,
mrdarrett
- Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
PD
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Rene Tschaggelar
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Andy Resnick
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
PD
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
PD
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
T Wake
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
cmaj10
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
actionintegral
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
platopes
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Igor
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Mike
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Greg Hansen
- The real kooks.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Metric Dictionary?,
Hatunen
US Supreme Court to Tackle Warming,
Sam Wormley
puzzle,
Vichu
EMF inducing Fluorescent Effects,
Sivas09
Hydraulic Presses and Force,
Dennis B
friction problem,
mcldias
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 782 June 27, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi,
Sam Wormley
"The Brilliance of Our Teachers",
Dlo
dedanoe defines trajectory,
dedanoe
traveling witouth moving,
dedanoe
Unifications of entropies,
kunzmilan
Halo nuclei,
Sam Wormley
Pale swirls on the surface of the Moon,
Sam Wormley
"Seeing" X-rays,
mike3
Re: Classical vs. Quantum?,
dweller
SCI.PHYSICS, FUCK YOUR ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
borje
New: mind reading computers,
Jan Panteltje
Simple Exercise - Jet Engine, Mass of Air Thru Turbine,
BrainDumb
Energy Cost of Ethanol,
Greg Hansen
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Message not availableRe: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
glhansen@xxxxxxx
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
Timo A. Nieminen
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
glhansen@xxxxxxx
IN ENGLISCH:A table of Mechanics. Schema:,
NILS BÖRJESSON
IN SWEDISCH:Mekanikens indelning. Schema:,
NILS BÖRJESSON
Understanding Bernoulli's Equation,
actionintegral
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC,
Andy Resnick
"The Right Angle Lever Paradox",
Dlo
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 26, 2006,
PhDs . org Webmaster
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales.,
Ken S. Tucker
Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure,
Radium
A Small Miracle,
stargene
Re: takes 1.5 gallons gasoline to produce 1 gallon ethanol in modern agriculture,
mmeron
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 78: dy/dt = ky(1 + y),
OsherD
Radionics and Orgone Technology,
streetsanto@xxxxxxxxx
Your "Domestic Terrorists" of tomorrow :-),
Math Freak
A word about most of you :-),
Math Freak
Somebody whining? :-),
Math Freak
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 77: The Universe as a Superposition of Two Real Normalized Phases x ( > = 0) or y( > = 0) and 1 - x or 1 - y,
OsherD
"How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?",
Egap
The Moving Dimensions problem,
NR
Re: THE GRAVITON DOESNT EXIST,
Eric Gisse
How big would it have to be?,
mike3
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 76: 1/(1 + y - x) and Feynman Again,
OsherD
Re: is entropy the Faraday law analog or the Ampere law analog Re:,
boson boss
On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces,
yinbing-zhou
Re: Why sending a signal, or travel, back in time can't be done,
New way to factor?,
jstevh
- Re: New way to factor?,
mmeron
- Re: New way to factor?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: New way to factor?,
T Wake
- Re: New way to factor?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: New way to factor?,
T Wake
- Re: New way to factor?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: New way to factor?,
T Wake
- Re: New way to factor?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: New way to factor?,
T Wake
- Re: New way to factor?,
Ken Oath
- Re: New way to factor?,
T Wake
- Re: New way to factor?,
Richard Tobin
- Re: New way to factor?,
mmeron
- Re: New way to factor?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: New way to factor?,
mmeron
- Re: New way to factor?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: New way to factor?,
mmeron
- Re: New way to factor?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: New way to factor?,
mmeron
- Re: New way to factor?,
Bernhard Kuemel
- Re: New way to factor?,
jstevh
- Re: New way to factor?,
cnctut
- Re: New way to factor?,
Jan Panteltje
Re: Star Distances,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
You can catch THEM :-),
Math Freak
the simplest system of units of measure,
donaldsauter
Jeff_Relf needs your vote!,
Phineas T Puddleduck
universal forces,
JoeT
Re: relatively confusing,
Dirk Van de moortel
Here's the Entropy_Time_Space model... back by popular demand...,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Here's the Entropy_Time_Space model... back by popular demand...,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Here's the Entropy_Time_Space model... back by popular demand...,
T Wake
- Re: Here's the Entropy_Time_Space model... back by popular demand...,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Like a lit match, consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys you.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Like a lit match, consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys you.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Like a lit match, consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys you.,
T Wake
- Re: Like a lit match, consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys you.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Like a lit match, consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys you.,
CrankHunter
- What's your job, Crank_Seeker ?,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: What's your job, Crank_Seeker ?,
Crank Hunter
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 75.1: PI and Space-time Averages of Gravitational/Classical Fields,
OsherD
Re: needs insight for de Broglie relation,
Greg Hansen
Re: Why no relativistic QM of fixed particle number?,
Greg Hansen
LHC due for 2007 start,
Sam Wormley
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC,
Eric Gisse
Re: mattress keeps inching off of bed,
Mohab
? complex elec permittivity,
Cheng Cosine
diFFerential-equations with symmetry that gives two invariants!,
NILS BÖRJESSON
Need a precise ammeter?,
Glenn Møller-Holst
here or there contd...(simultaineity for the third time!!!),
oldton
"The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe",
Egap
OT: Pluto's Twins Get Their Names (Nix and Hydra),
Sam Wormley
Asshole of the month boilerplate,
Tom Potter
Newton is a shithead,
dedanoe
how do stars get born?,
dedanoe
I've got too many things on my plate right now.,
Jeff…Relf
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 72: Bianchi Identity Type Creates A New Kind of "Imaginary" Number,
OsherD
Single-electron counter breaks new record,
Sam Wormley
Re: takes 1.5 gallons gasoline to produce 1 gallon ethanol in modern agriculture,
Externet
Conservation of light energy...,
Externet
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi,
OsherD
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi,
Spice Malenge
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi,
donstockbauer
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi,
OsherD
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi,
Spice Malenge
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi,
OsherD
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds,
Edward Green
Gore Slams Global Warming Critics,
tadchem
Re: Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Two up quarks and one down quark.,
malibu
Re: Gravity - Caused by GR curvature or gravitons?,
Sam Wormley
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 19 June 2006 http://focus.aps.org/,
Sam Wormley
Re: --off topic --Is Ann Coulter a Terrorist?,
hhc314
Paper: Bug juice - harvesting electricity with microorganisms,
Robert Karl Stonjek
? find wave field using fft,
Cheng Cosine
Space Travel consequences,
zach
Truth or Hoax?,
rangeravenger
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 781 June 19, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi,
Sam Wormley
Newton?,
sensible
"Retic Postings and SPAM",
Egap
Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Igor
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Sorcerer
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Igor
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
actionintegral
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
T Wake
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
actionintegral
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
actionintegral
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
actionintegral
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
PD
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Timo A. Nieminen
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Timo A. Nieminen
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Edward Green
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
here or there??,
oldton
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 19, 2006,
PhDs . org Webmaster
How quantum a sub-particle is?,
Jack
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?,
malibu
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?,
Glenn Møller-Holst
Re: Peking man is considered by many experts to be the,
Edward Green
Can the anthropic principle be scientific?,
Robert
Six Carbon atoms sharing twelve electrons.,
malibu
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 70: Logistic vs Lotka-Volterra vs Competition,
OsherD
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD),
Y.Porat
Re: I'm benching 2.5/.35 Mbps, i.e. 2.5 Mega bits per second down, .35 Mbps up.,
T Wake
"Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?",
Yad
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 69: Lotka-Volterra Equations,
OsherD
GRAVITATION,
киров
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- <Possible follow-ups>
- GRAVITATION,
киров
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: GRAVITATION,
kirov
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
FrediFizzx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
FrediFizzx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
FrediFizzx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Sue...
- Re: GRAVITATION,
FrediFizzx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Sue...
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
FrediFizzx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
FrediFizzx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Y.Porat
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Y.Porat
Message not available
Re: I should submit a bug report to Google.,
Edward Green
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Modeling nature herself, God.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Modeling nature herself, God.,
T Wake
- Eintein endlessly asserted that dice/nature are/is pseudorandom.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Eintein endlessly asserted that dice/nature are/is pseudorandom.,
T Wake
- Re: Eintein endlessly asserted that dice/nature are/is pseudorandom.,
Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone.,
Brad Guth
- Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone.,
T Wake
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone.,
Brad Guth
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone.,
T Wake
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableEither mars is too cold, venus is too hot, or we're too picky.,
Jeff…Relf
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales,
Ken S. Tucker
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 68: dy/dt = y(1 - x), dx/dt = x(1 - y),
OsherD
Re: Test,
Greg Neill
"A Snapshot of a Photon",
Yad
(mechanical) Gravity,
JoeT
Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
FrediFizzx
Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
Message not available
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
Mike
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
JoeT
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
Mike
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
FrediFizzx
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
JoeT
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
JoeT
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
JoeT
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
JoeT
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
Eric Gisse
Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
Y.Porat
Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Scientific Errors (Revision),
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Thomas Smid
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Greg Neill
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Sorcerer
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Sorcerer
- Re: Scientific Errors,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Sorcerer
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Sorcerer
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Jim Black
- Re: Scientific Errors,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Scientific Errors,
CWatters
- Re: Scientific Errors,
PD
- Re: Scientific Errors,
blair . houghton
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Thomas Smid
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Thomas Smid
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Thomas Smid
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
mmeron
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Thomas Smid
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Thomas Smid
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Thomas Smid
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Thomas Smid
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Scientific Errors,
jimp
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Scientific Errors,
jimp
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
jimp
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Message not available
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
Chemists have fashioned tiny dots of carbon that glow in response to light,
Sam Wormley
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 67: dy/dt = 1 + y - x for x = t,
OsherD
Spitzer Finds Distant Clusters of Galaxies,
Sam Wormley
Not exactly rocket science but...,
jt64
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 16 Jun 06 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
spinning coin animation for C6H12,
ma1ibu
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 66: Cross-Logistic Modified/Generalized Equations Continued,
OsherD
"Gravity",
Yad
Re: Clean room--definition?,
Randy Poe
Repulsion binds atoms,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Edward Green
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Edward Green
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
ma1ibu
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Edward Green
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Edward Green
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Edward Green
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Ken S. Tucker
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Edward Green
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
malibu
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Ken Muldrew
Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Y.Porat
? why can one solve Helmholtz eqn in one z-dir along,
Cheng Cosine
Re: THE MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Blackbody spectrum,
Giorgio Pastore