Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Jun 2006 10:35:24 -0700
PD wrote:
BIG SNIP
Therefore it does
no good to try to extrapolate what we know from the universe *today* to
deduce what must have happened or been in force then. It simply is not
true that what is trustworthy in our universe can be assumed to be
trustworthy then.
PD
What a load of religious crap, PD conveniently
suspends the Laws of Physics to create a
universe, where do these crack-pots come from?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Martha
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: PD
- Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Prev by Date: Re: Elegant Derivation of Lorentz Transformation?
- Next by Date: Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- Previous by thread: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Next by thread: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|