Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- From: "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Jun 2006 11:41:34 -0700
hetware wrote:
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
dx^0 = c*dt , t=time, c= speed of light.
It's a standard notation in tensor analysis.
Thank you. I was reading that as raised to the power. I am familiar with
the superscript notation in tensor analysis. I just didn't catch on that
you were using ^ to indicate it. In Mathematica it means 'raised to the
power of', and I guess force of habit blinded me to the obvious. I probably
should have waited till the first cup of coffee kicked in before I posted.
Ascii sucks a bit. In this group are variations
like dx^1 = dx, dx^2 = dy , dx^3 = dz,
sometimes people use dx2 == dx*dx,
there are no *official* standards so I usually
understand the context, or, as you did ask
for clarification, hang around it'll grow on ya.
LOL
Ken
.
- References:
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- From: John C . Polasek
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- From: hetware
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- From: hetware
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- Prev by Date: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Next by Date: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Previous by thread: Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- Next by thread: Re: Need help with Gold dissolved in sea water
- Index(es):
Loading