Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- From: hetware <massless@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:24:38 -0400
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
dx^0 = c*dt , t=time, c= speed of light.
It's a standard notation in tensor analysis.
Thank you. I was reading that as raised to the power. I am familiar with
the superscript notation in tensor analysis. I just didn't catch on that
you were using ^ to indicate it. In Mathematica it means 'raised to the
power of', and I guess force of habit blinded me to the obvious. I probably
should have waited till the first cup of coffee kicked in before I posted.
--
http://www.vho.org/GB/c/DC/gcgvcole.html
http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/
http://www.germarrudolf.com/
http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/051115chicago.htm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- References:
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- From: John C . Polasek
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- From: hetware
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- Prev by Date: Re: Elegant Derivation of Lorentz Transformation?
- Next by Date: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Previous by thread: Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- Next by thread: Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?
- Index(es):