Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?

From: "The Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 20:22:52 GMT

"Dave" <general_sniper@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149710050.844716.105020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Ken S. Tucker wrote:
| > That's religious, there is NO evidence for a BB.
| > Ken
|
| Yes, it's just an accepted part of an empirical science for no reason
| at all. Completely arbitrary.

Empirical science?
What the *** is that, shithead?

.

References:
- Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
  - From: Martha
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
  - From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
  - From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
  - From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
  - From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
  - From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
  - From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
  - From: Dave

Prev by Date: Re: Swing and momentum
Next by Date: Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 57: PI is Non-Hilbert Functional Analysis
Previous by thread: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
Next by thread: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread