Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 22:07:49 +0100
In article <Qr6dncFXbOKCDBXZRVnyvw@xxxxxxxxx>, T Wake
<Usenet.es7AT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149800177.799780.117860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
...
"You need to postulate a method of creation"
Who made up that rule?
Ken
Its pretty standard physics -
Ms. Duck: are all you're standards "pretty"
and do you rely on , "method of creation"
for your science??
Depending on your terminology.
However you still haven't answered the question. If you factor out the Big
Bang, with what method do you explain all the other data which currently
supports it?
Are you going to assert that all our measurements (redshift of supernovae,
CMBR, etc) are flawed and don't actually indicate a cosmos which is
expanding and is approximately 1.4x10^10 years old?
If you accept the universe has an "age" it follows it has a creation point /
event. (I do not use this in the Biblical sense)
I don't understand it either - I doidn't think it was a trick question
I asked ;-)
--
The greatest enemy of science is psuedoscience.
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- References:
- Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Martha
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Greg Hansen
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: T Wake
- Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Prev by Date: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Next by Date: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Previous by thread: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Next by thread: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|