Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?


srp wrote:
Ken S. Tucker a écrit :
Greg Hansen wrote:
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
PD wrote:
but that's irrelevant to whether others feel comfortable
with the evidence for it.

That's religious, there is NO evidence for a BB.
Ken

I'm surprised that you've missed this stuff. Big Bang theories are
based on general relativity. You know, that "greatest blunder" can't
get a static universe stuff? Intuitively, it seems pretty obvious that
if stuff is moving away from us, then it was a lot closer in the past
(cite redshifting versus distance as evidence). Structure of the
background radiation, every once in a while rags like Physics Today
publish new comparisons of measurement with theory. Gravitational
lensing apparantly caused by clumps of the dark matter that some wrote
off as fiction. Theories of Big Bang nucleosynthesis correctly predict
ratios of primordial isotopes.

There's actually quite a bit more than zero evidence there.

Let's be careful, there is no evidence that the
so-called "Red Shift" is of Doppler origin, that's
an assumption.

Very good point. There is no evidence whatsoever that
the Hubble red shift, the main argument supporting the BB idea,
is _entirely_ due to Doppler effect, if at all.

Hubble himself doubted it.

Yup...

Back to geocentrism again.

Yup, hope Feddifizzx get's a view of Weinbergs
pg 523. After-all the speed of the Solar System
(Eq.(15.5.27) is only 300 km/sec, wrt the CMBR
placing us back in the middle again.
My thrust is to call a conjecture a conjecture,
it's not promoted to a theory until it's based
on testable and well defined postulates, and
NO MIRACLES!!!!.
Regrads
Ken S. Tucker

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
    ... Big Bang theories are ... (cite redshifting versus distance as evidence). ... so-called "Red Shift" is of Doppler origin, ... the Hubble red shift, the main argument supporting the BB idea, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
    ... there is NO evidence for a BB. ... Big Bang theories are ... every once in a while rags like Physics Today ... Theories of Big Bang nucleosynthesis correctly predict ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
    ... Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: ... there is NO evidence for a BB. ... Big Bang theories are ... background radiation, every once in a while rags like Physics Today ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
    ... Ken S. Tucker wrote: ... there is NO evidence for a BB. ... Big Bang theories are based on general relativity. ... Intuitively, it seems pretty obvious that if stuff is moving away from us, then it was a lot closer in the past (cite redshifting versus distance as evidence). ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Steven J doesnt save Rusty Sites mistaken view of "evidence"
    ... this conjecture was mistaken. ... investigators can gather data that *becomes* evidence when someone ... We follow theories not raw data. ... Discordant data does cause us to modify or abandon our ...
    (talk.origins)