Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Jun 2006 13:23:05 -0700
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article <1149794825.551707.66020@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ken
S. Tucker <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Greg Hansen wrote:
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
PD wrote:
but that's irrelevant to whether others feel comfortable
with the evidence for it.
That's religious, there is NO evidence for a BB.
Ken
I'm surprised that you've missed this stuff. Big Bang theories are
based on general relativity. You know, that "greatest blunder" can't
get a static universe stuff? Intuitively, it seems pretty obvious that
if stuff is moving away from us, then it was a lot closer in the past
(cite redshifting versus distance as evidence). Structure of the
background radiation, every once in a while rags like Physics Today
publish new comparisons of measurement with theory. Gravitational
lensing apparantly caused by clumps of the dark matter that some wrote
off as fiction. Theories of Big Bang nucleosynthesis correctly predict
ratios of primordial isotopes.
There's actually quite a bit more than zero evidence there.
Let's be careful, there is no evidence that the
so-called "Red Shift" is of Doppler origin, that's
an assumption. And the idea that CMBR are
radiation remanents of the BB is really pushing
strange assumptions, again without evidence.
How else would you explain an isotropic, nearly perfect black body
radiation?
"You need to postulate a method of creation"
Who made up that rule?
Ken
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- References:
- Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Martha
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Greg Hansen
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Prev by Date: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Next by Date: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Previous by thread: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Next by thread: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading