Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?

Ken S. Tucker a écrit :
Greg Hansen wrote:
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
PD wrote:
but that's irrelevant to whether others feel comfortable
with the evidence for it.

That's religious, there is NO evidence for a BB.
Ken

I'm surprised that you've missed this stuff. Big Bang theories are
based on general relativity. You know, that "greatest blunder" can't
get a static universe stuff? Intuitively, it seems pretty obvious that
if stuff is moving away from us, then it was a lot closer in the past
(cite redshifting versus distance as evidence). Structure of the
background radiation, every once in a while rags like Physics Today
publish new comparisons of measurement with theory. Gravitational
lensing apparantly caused by clumps of the dark matter that some wrote
off as fiction. Theories of Big Bang nucleosynthesis correctly predict
ratios of primordial isotopes.

There's actually quite a bit more than zero evidence there.

Let's be careful, there is no evidence that the
so-called "Red Shift" is of Doppler origin, that's
an assumption.

Very good point. There is no evidence whatsoever that
the Hubble red shift, the main argument supporting the BB idea,
is _entirely_ due to Doppler effect, if at all.

Hubble himself doubted it.

Back to geocentrism again.

André Michaud
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
    ... there is NO evidence for a BB. ... Big Bang theories are ... every once in a while rags like Physics Today ... Theories of Big Bang nucleosynthesis correctly predict ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
    ... there is NO evidence for a BB. ... Big Bang theories are ... the Hubble red shift, the main argument supporting the BB idea, ... My thrust is to call a conjecture a conjecture, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
    ... Phineas T Puddleduck wrote: ... there is NO evidence for a BB. ... Big Bang theories are ... background radiation, every once in a while rags like Physics Today ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
    ... Ken S. Tucker wrote: ... there is NO evidence for a BB. ... Big Bang theories are based on general relativity. ... Intuitively, it seems pretty obvious that if stuff is moving away from us, then it was a lot closer in the past (cite redshifting versus distance as evidence). ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
    ... Ken S. Tucker a écrit: ... there is NO evidence for a BB. ... is _entirely_ due to Doppler effect, ... interpretation of the Hubble red shift. ...
    (sci.physics)