Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: "T Wake" <Usenet.es7AT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 22:31:04 +0100
"srp" <srp2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:44888AA0.9080108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Quite refreshing to see plain common sense raising its head
again Ken.
Without being unduly rude, it is often the case that people see common sense
when it is simply a matter of someone agreeing with them.
There are lots of aspects of physics (on all scales) which can be seen to
defy immediate common sense, although they tend to become clearer with
study - this is not always the case.
Although apparently unrelated, I have a view that separate
confirmation that the pioneer axial spin so-called "anomaly"
(that I have just heard about) is not an anomaly at all,
may go a long way to do away for good with the Doppler
interpretation of the Hubble red shift.
That would be an interesting change to cosmology. For a start it would cause
all manner of problems regarding the age of the universe and the results
from parallax measurements (as these all "agree," a flaw would have
implications throughout)
Unfortunately for the time scale, there is no way for my
own views to be formally published.
Why not?
I am positive however that reason will ultimately prevail.
Yes. Good.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- References:
- Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Martha
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Greg Hansen
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: srp
- Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Prev by Date: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Next by Date: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Previous by thread: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Next by thread: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|