Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?

In article <1149803687.030289.251770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ken
S. Tucker <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article <1149801813.176066.292290@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ken
S. Tucker <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article <1149801042.551033.199720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ken
S. Tucker <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

srp wrote:


Yup...

Back to geocentrism again.

Yup, hope Feddifizzx get's a view of Weinbergs
pg 523. After-all the speed of the Solar System
(Eq.(15.5.27) is only 300 km/sec, wrt the CMBR
placing us back in the middle again.
My thrust is to call a conjecture a conjecture,
it's not promoted to a theory until it's based
on testable and well defined postulates, and
NO MIRACLES!!!!.
Regrads
Ken S. Tucker

OK

So how do you explain the CMB, its anisotropies (and their scaling).
Because if you just give me some fluff about the way I phrase things
(btw, pretty standard is a pretty standard term) then all I can assume
is that you consider the CMB a MIRACLE as well.

((FWIW I have alternative cosmology's but
that would be a distraction)).

It's silly to jump from CMBR to BB.
Ken


So, if I may ask, are you saying you agree with inflationary expansion
and everything past it - just not the idea of a t-0 event?

I think the astro data is soft, and depending
on religion you can choose any sort of cosmo
model's you'd like, including the BB conjecture.

Myself, I lean toward the infinite universe,
probably because I'm claustraphobic.
Ken


Can I trouble you to explain what you mean by "soft"?

--
The greatest enemy of science is psuedoscience.

Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
    ... My thrust is to call a conjecture a conjecture, ... So how do you explain the CMB, ... pretty standard is a pretty standard term) ... Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
    ... My thrust is to call a conjecture a conjecture, ... So how do you explain the CMB, ... pretty standard is a pretty standard term) ... Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
    ... My thrust is to call a conjecture a conjecture, ... So how do you explain the CMB, ... pretty standard is a pretty standard term) ... It's silly to jump from CMBR to BB. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
    ... My thrust is to call a conjecture a conjecture, ... So how do you explain the CMB, ... pretty standard is a pretty standard term) ... It's silly to jump from CMBR to BB. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
    ... My thrust is to call a conjecture a conjecture, ... pretty standard is a pretty standard term) ... of galaxies is fairly uniform, ... Doppler red shift explanation that underpins BB. ...
    (sci.physics)