Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?

In article <4YKdncKX1drsPRXZRVnygw@xxxxxxxxx>, T Wake
<Usenet.es7AT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Because I am just a Joe out of the street. Not part of the
community. I have no control over the time it will take for
my ideas to filter up and even be discussed.

Well, have they been submitted to a journal? You can start by describing the
experiments you feel would support your ideas.

Generally speaking, there are hordes of scientists who would bite your arms
off for a head start in re-writing cosmology. The fame and kudos that would
attach to such a person are phenomenal.

Oh yes. Cosmology is a field which is prime for a revolution in
thinking in that respect. The more people subjecting good papers
outlining ideas the better. Look at MOND for example. Although I accept
WMAP's conclusions re Dark Matter, i find the idea of Gravity itself
being incompletely understood agreeable, because after all - we don't
truly unerstand gravity to the same degree as other forces. But thats
my opinion, and I know what thats worth ;-)

--
The greatest enemy of science is psuedoscience.

Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast