Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: srp <srp2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 10:57:27 GMT
Dave a écrit :
srp wrote:Dave a écrit :Ken S. Tucker wrote:Not totally arbitrary, it seems to me. Isn't it a conjecture thatThat's religious, there is NO evidence for a BB.Yes, it's just an accepted part of an empirical science for no reason
Ken
at all. Completely arbitrary.
depends on GR being the final theory ?
André Michaud
'Tis called sarcasm.
I wasn't sure.
Anyhow, it was darn effective ;-)
André Michaud
.
- References:
- Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Martha
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Dave
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Dave
- Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Prev by Date: Electron composition and electron division
- Next by Date: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Previous by thread: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Next by thread: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|