Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension.

(Sorry last one sent by mistake)

"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Jun_8_FklD@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi T_Puddleduck,

Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Friedmann-Lema%C3%AEtre-Robertson-Walker
and WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Cosmic_inflation

Now it is nice that you feel the need to repeatedly post Wikipedia links but
you really would be better off trying to learn what you are talking about.

WMAP's March 2006 polarity data is consistent with an ever constant
lambda,
not the huge lambda found in the Cosmic_Inflation theory.

Where on either link you cite is there anything implying "an ever constant
lambda?" More importantly, where is there anything in the links you cited
which disagrees with the Big-Bang-Inflation model?

The observable universe was Planck length 13.7 billion light-years
away in Cosmic_Time... this length Should_Be the result of
an ever-constant lambda... it's wrong if it isn't.

What is wrong? The length or the theory which implies it should be the
result of..?

What experiments can you think of with which we can test this, ahem, theory
of yours?

But the big bang originated everywhere, not just in one place,

Nothing in the big-bang-inflation model suggests there is a "place" where
the t=0 event took place. What have you read which says otherwise?

so the 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension
which is best demarcated in degrees Kelvin.

Really? Where on Earth did you pluck this from? Remember, not only do you
have to come up with a reason for having a "fifth" spatial dimension but you
need to explain away the previous data which pretty much supports the idea
of three spatial dimensions.

For now we will avoid the issue of why _you_ have decided five is the magic
number for the dimensionality of the universe. I will pretend (for a while)
that it isn't arbitrary and you actually have reasoned from first
principles.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Casting problem
    ... For the same reason to use anonymous functions (at least one of the ... Actually I'm all-up for anonymous methods for delegates; ... abbreviated lambda syntax. ... delegates in one method call. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: spec 3.1.2.1.2 and the lambda exception
    ... > without having to use funcall, ... but rather that a LAMBDA macro exists as a convenience so ... at all is that there exists a LAMBDA macro which rewrites ... > 1) there is some good reason to allow lambda expressions in the car. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Corriolis force
    ... Mike Coslo wrote: ... and lambda is the wavelength. ... The reason that your experiment won't work is that ...
    (rec.radio.amateur.antenna)
  • Re: whats wrong with "lambda x : print x/60,x%60"
    ... > Why would one need print in lambda? ... > is ugly work around though still 100% functional). ... I dashed that last part off quickly, so I don't have a good reason. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.lang.python)