Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:08:09 +0100
In article <1149961741.867646.6610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ken
S. Tucker <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Read your post Mr. Hansen,
At one time "science" was regarded as something
based on repeatable observations. But recently
science now includes social science, statistics,
tea leaves, bumps on head and anything else
that is politically correct.
Cosmological origin - assuming there was one -
cannot be repeated, the evidence is the universe
always existed, as no contradiction of conservation
of mass-energy has been found. BB as a scientific
theory is DOA, but it may have value as a working
conjecture, which is fine with me.
Ken S. Tucker
So what you are saying is that we shouldn't indulge in science that
seeks to answer questions in cosmology. We should just shrug our
shoulders and say "ok"....
--
The greatest enemy of science is pseudoscience.
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
.
- References:
- Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Martha
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Greg Hansen
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: glhansen@xxxxxxx
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Prev by Date: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Next by Date: Re: Zarqawi did not die instantly
- Previous by thread: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Next by thread: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|