Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:10:41 +0100
In article <e6f29c$b9d$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, in reality your TV CRT needs no relativity, there was no relativity
at issue when the first CRTs were manufactured, and very little if any now.
I have worked on part of the electronics of a lineac, and needed no relativty,
the 'white coats' for sure had it on their sandwiches....
GPS needs no relativity for it to WORK, but maybe to explain, in that case
Rela Tivity gives some numbers, but there are other theories.
talking about sensitive: the Lovers of Rela Tivity, they are hair trigger....
But the worst are those who really have no hands on and some intersest of
some sort... and there are BOTS too.... Rela Tivity Lover Bots.
Like a dildo.
www.eftaylor.com has a good analysis on the use of relativity in GR. It
only requires some simple calculus. But then again, that paragraph
alone shows you're pretty fixed in your world view and no amount of
percussive maintenance will change that.
--
The greatest enemy of science is pseudoscience.
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?
- References:
- Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?
- Prev by Date: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Next by Date: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Previous by thread: Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?
- Next by thread: Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading