Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?

In article <448B8659.3010500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, srp
<srp2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Well PT, quite unexpected and welcome.

Glad that you think this may be of interest. Marmet really was on
to something that really rang a bell for me the minute I read his
paper.

As already mentioned, time is not an issue for me. So delays or even
no actual follow ups don't really matter to me.

I am not clear though as to what you mean by a "precis". If you
clarify, I'd be happy to oblige.

Regards

André Michaud

If this comes through twice, blame my newsreader... ;-) It just crashed.

Basically, what I meant was could you give me a five minute breakdown
of the paper, as if talking to an undergrad, about what you feel the
main important points are.

I've just got some more paper for my printer so I will probably print
it out this week, I cant read pdf's on the screen, for some reason I
just cannot take it in - on paper I can scribble on the page etc ;-)

--
The greatest enemy of science is pseudoscience.

Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
.