Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...
- From: "T Wake" <Usenet.es7AT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 06:59:32 +0100
"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Jun_11_DcQh@xxxxxxxxxxxx
God T_Wake,
It is OK Jeff, I am not your God. I just know more about physics than you.
You wrote:
Makes no reference to "Inflation" requiring gravity waves.
You obviously can't read,
much less understand what you're reading.
Sadly, even your copy and paste here shows _your_ lack of comprehension.
Before we continue, "primordial" in this context refers to the t=0 event,
not the subsequent inflationary period.
Let me quote the part about polarities and polerized gravity waves
here for all to see:
The cosmic microwave background
is polarized at the level of a few microkelvins.
There are two types of polarization, called E-modes and B-modes.
This is in analogy to electrostatics, in which the electric field
( E-field ) has a vanishing curl and the magnetic field
( B-field ) has a vanishing divergence.
The E-modes arise naturally from Thomson scattering
in an inhomogeneous plasma. The B-modes, which have not been measured
and are thought to have an amplitude of at most a 0.1 µK,
are not produced from the plasma physics alone.
They are a [ polerized ] signal from _Cosmic_Inflation_
^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^
This is a single reference to inflation in the article you masturbate over.
However, in this context it _still_ doesn't imply that the inflationary
model requires or predicts any gravity waves over those predicted / inferred
by the t=0 event.
This is talking about the polerisation of the CMBR, not the existence (or
otherwise) of gravity waves, which is used to support the inflationary
model.
and are determined by the density of primordial _Gravitational_Waves_.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^
Well, this bit has nothing to do with inflation - this relates directly to
the t=0 event.
Once more, Jeff, it seems that you have problem working out which theory you
want to attack
A. Lewis and A. Challinor (2006).
" Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB ". Phys. Rep.
Weak Gravitational_Lensing has several important effects on
the cosmic microwave background (CMB):
it changes the CMB power spectra,
induces non-Gaussianities, and
generates a B-mode polarization signal
that is an important source of confusion for
the signal from primordial Gravitational_Waves.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^
t=0 event not inflation. I will say this again, as you appear to be a slow
learner, the t=0 event is expected to have caused gravity waves (if they
exist), although the existence of gravity waves is not required to support
the t=0 event, and the inflationary period is expected to have caused the
polarisation of the CMBR and explain *why* the CMBR "looks like it does."
The lensing signal can also be used
to help constrain cosmological parameters and lensing mass
distributions.
We review the origin and calculation of these effects.
Topics include: lensing in General Relativity, the lensing potential,
lensed temperature and polarization power spectra,
implications for constraining _Inflation_, non-Gaussian structure,
^^^^^^^^^
Jeff, learn to read.
reconstruction of the lensing potential, delensing,
sky curvature corrections, simulations, cosmological parameter
estimation,
cluster mass reconstruction, and moving lenses/dipole lensing.
__ Arxiv.ORG/abs/astro-ph/0601594
As I've point out many times before,
And been wrong each time.
Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition,
and it explains nothing that an ever-constant lambda wouldn't explain
better
and with much, much more evidence.
Your lack of understanding doesn't make the model wrong.
.
- References:
- The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension.
- From: Jeff…Relf
- Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension.
- From: T Wake
- T_Wake, can't you count that high ?
- From: Jeff…Relf
- Re: T_Wake, can't you count that high ?
- From: T Wake
- The width of the _Observable_ universe is 158 light-years and counting.
- From: Jeff…Relf
- Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...
- From: Jeff…Relf
- The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension.
- Prev by Date: Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 61: Measures including M(X)
- Next by Date: Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?
- Previous by thread: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...
- Next by thread: Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|