Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...

In article <Jeff_Relf_2006_Jun_11_DcQh@xxxxxxxxx>, Jeff?ĶRelf
<Jeff_Relf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


You obviously can't read,
much less understand what you're reading.

Let me quote the part about polarities and polerized gravity waves
here for all to see:

Note: From your beloved P_O_S wiki article on LCDM

The É©CDM is a Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker model. It is a
scientific model which assumes that general relativity is correct. If
we ignore topology (hmmm we should probably add this as an implicit
assumption to the article content), then a flat or hyperbolic model is
infinite, and a spherical model is finite, in spatial volume. See shape
of the universe for more about possible shapes of a spatial section at
constant time in this model.

The É©CDM model, if interpreted naively (literally) very definitely
represents the Universe to be infinite. No serious scientist really
tries to overtly claim that the Universe is necessarily infinite, but
we agree that it's a property of the model. Please read wikipedia pages
on cosmology or any introductory cosmology text on the web or in print.


Note:

You cannot even comprehend why you are utterly wrong over inflation

You wrongly claimed WMAP and Planck Surveyor were gravity detection
probes

Nowhere on Wiki even CLAIMS temperature is a dimension.

--
The greatest enemy of science is pseudoscience.

Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
.

Relevant Pages
Loading