Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?


FrediFizzx wrote:
"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1150088260.810580.238110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
FrediFizzx wrote:
....
Good but I am still jumping around in it. And I got sidetracked big
time by the Moffat stuff you mentioned. ;-) He has some fantastic
ideas. I quote from the last paragraph of the Conclusion of,

http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506021

In that article, Moffat alludes to a foundation
based on NGT, which in turn embraces the
concept of *Non-Symmetrical Metric* tensors.
I have a hard time finding much clear math
on that subject, I think mathematicians prefer
to remain on a continuum, but NSM's beg
for quantization, something difficult to do
formally, but potentially very powerful as
we both sense.
Moffat, as I, have been studying this subject
for 2-3 decades, so maybe I could provide, in
essay form, an article for your web-site, with
your editorial assistance, to get a basic handle
on NSM's. Email me if you want about that.

Well, I think you really should read the Randall "Warped Passages..."
book first. I think it will give you some further great insights about
this. Actually it is only the last 3rd of the book; the first part she
is just reviewing the developments of modern physics to set up her
viewpoints. My viewpoint is that fermionic quantum objects are the
source of NSM's so we are definitely on the same page. Just approaching
it from different directions. ;-)

I think I can see that, perhaps the field of the
elusive graviton, (or other boson as Moffat mentions
in the above article) is equivalent to a NSM.

"In contrast to standard dark matter models, we should not search
for
new stable particles such as weakly interacting massive particles
(WIMPS) or neutralinos, because the fifth force charge in STVG that
is
the source of the neutral vector field (skew field) is carried by
the
known stable baryons (and electrons and neutrinos). This new charge
is
the source of a fifth force skew field that modifies the
gravitational
field in the universe."

Yes, that article is bold, Moffat's courageous.

Yeah, he surely seems to be not holding anything back. I like that a
lot. Gonna study a bunch of the refs that he mentions in the above
article also over the next few weeks. I am finally going to be free
sometime in August and then will be pouncing on this with great vigor.

"August" ok, putting that on my calendar, what time
is it now...oh yeah June, gotcha.

Quantum Vacuum Charge rules, baby! ;-)

Cheers!

Ya know, I never thought of QVC being responsible for a fifth force but
it would have to be. So I am excited about this recent development.

Sometimes I think it's the same force with
many harmonics.
....
In the meantime... onward thru the fog! Hehe. Nature sure did give us
a really neat puzzle to try to figure out.

Inanimate matter seems to know what to do,
have we outsmarted ourselves :-).
Ken

FrediFizzx

Quantum Vacuum Charge papers;
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0601110
http://www.vacuum-physics.com

.