Re: Truth or Hoax?
- From: Roy L. Fuchs <roylfuchs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:53:22 GMT
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:11:48 -0500, "John Meglier"
<spamless@xxxxxxxxxx> Gave us:
But turbochargers heat up the air,
Yep. Actually ANY compression of a gas will yield more apparent
heat. This is how air conditioning works.
and if too hot causes detonation,
(pre-ignition),
Most (if not all) pre-ignition is not cause by the gas (air)
temperature, it is caused by hot spots on valves and combustion
chamber surfaces, as well as piston surfaces in some designs.
and in a gasoline engine this puts holes in the pistons.
It puts holes in ANY softer material. If the heads were aluminum,
the detonations would pit the combustion chamber surfaces as well.
It can cause all kinds of problems all the way up to and including
blowing your intake apart. Usually, low octane bad gas causes burned
exhaust valves, which also promote pre-ignition.
A little water injection can cool it down some, but it is easier and safer
to just retard the timing.
Which doesn't always work with hotspots. Water ALWAYS works. So do
other octane raising additives. Water in the combustion chamber does
NOT "corrode your engine". Petroleum fuels give off water when they
combust, so there is plenty around, a little on the pre-fired side of
things won't hurt anything. It is all in how it gets introduced.
but then you don't get full HP out of the engine.
No ***. The WHOLE reason, as I stated earlier, for a higher octane
number is not raw power from the fuel as there is actually less. It
is that fact that the engine can be set up to make more power.
normal street car can take about 6 pounds of boost before running into
detonation problems (atmospheric pressure + 6 )
There is no reference for "normal street car". SOME cars have flat
top pistons. These can be boosted easily. SOME cars have sculpted
piston tops, and these engines cannot be boosted as much, until
modifications/trade outs to some of the engine components have been
made.
Still, there is no substitute for a real good, high octane number
gas. Particularly when boosting. I use to run REAL 104 octane fuels,
and there is a significant difference between them and the 85 marked
87 CRAP they are pushing onto us now. No wonder the bastards are
making record profits. The fuel quality has gone to ***, and the
refinery operator has pimples on his ass from sitting at the desk all
day. While our wallets get thinner.
.
- References:
- Truth or Hoax?
- From: rangeravenger
- Re: Truth or Hoax?
- From: John Meglier
- Re: Truth or Hoax?
- From: rangeravenger
- Re: Truth or Hoax?
- From: John Meglier
- Re: Truth or Hoax?
- From: Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: Truth or Hoax?
- From: John Meglier
- Truth or Hoax?
- Prev by Date: Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi
- Next by Date: Single-electron counter breaks new record
- Previous by thread: Re: Truth or Hoax?
- Next by thread: Re: Truth or Hoax?
- Index(es):