Re: GRAVITATION
- From: "FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 23:05:11 -0700
"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:449aca67$0$18509$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"srp" <srp2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:449AC627.8090109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I don't think you can use G as defined (G=6.67^-11) in this context.
It was defined for use in the Solar System at the macro level, not
at the atomic level.
There's a reason that the law is called "The Universal Law of
Gravity"; In its formulation, the law applies to all masses no
matter what the size or distances involved.
Now, if you want to invoke some other theory of gravitation
other than Newton's (or even Einstein's), then all bets are off
and you can diddle with G to your heart's content. But you
should first make clear that this is what you are proposing to do.
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0602607
"Spectrum of Cosmic Microwave Fluctuations and the Formation of Galaxies
in a Modified Gravity Theory"
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506021
"Scalar-Tensor-Vector Gravity Theory"
Quantum Vacuum Charge rules, baby!
FrediFizzx
Quantum Vacuum Charge papers;
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0601110
http://www.vacuum-physics.com
.
- References:
- GRAVITATION
- From: киров
- GRAVITATION
- Prev by Date: Re: GRAVITATION
- Next by Date: Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 76: 1/(1 + y - x) and Feynman Again
- Previous by thread: Re: GRAVITATION
- Next by thread: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 69: Lotka-Volterra Equations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
