Re: GRAVITATION
- From: "Y.Porat" <maporat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Jun 2006 08:18:04 -0700
and the acceleration equation.
---------------------------------
Now, if you resolve G in that equation, you get
F = (4 pi^2 r^3)/(M T^2) * Mm/r^2
symplifying, you get
F = m (4 pi^2 r)/T^2
Now, to square the radius you need to multiply
and divide by mutually reducible occurrences of
the radius
F = m (4 pi^2 r^2)/r T^2
But since (2 pi r) is the length of the orbit,
then (2 pi r)/T is the velocity
So, you can resolve for the velocity
F = m v^2/r = 8.238721759E-8 N
or
F = ma = 8.238721759E-8 N
This is why you cannot intermix the Coulomb equation
with the gravitational equation. They simply are
two different representation of the very same
classical acceleration equation F=ma expressed
differently. You can substitute one for the other,
but you cannot intermix them.
For the hydrogen atom,
F = ke^2/r^2 = GMm/r^2 = ma = 8.238721759E-8 N
André Michaud
did you assume that the electron is orbiting around the nuc .????
ATB
Y.Porat
--------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GRAVITATION
- From: srp
- Re: GRAVITATION
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION
- References:
- GRAVITATION
- From: киров
- Re: GRAVITATION
- From: kirov
- Re: GRAVITATION
- From: srp
- GRAVITATION
- Prev by Date: Re: How big would it have to be?
- Next by Date: Re: GRAVITATION
- Previous by thread: Re: GRAVITATION
- Next by thread: Re: GRAVITATION
- Index(es):