Re: GRAVITATION
- From: srp <srp2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 17:51:18 GMT
Phineas T Puddleduck a écrit :
In article <449E9060.2040505@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, srp
<srp2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This means that if you want to use G in the
hydrogen atom, you have to recalculate G with
values that are meaningful to the hydrogen atom,
and which are
r = Bohr radius = 5.291772083E-11 m
M = mass of the proton = 1.67262158E-27 kg
and from the frequency of the Bohr ground
state energy (f = 6.57968391E15 Hz) you can
calculate T
T = 1/frequency = 1.519829851E-16 s
If you recalculate G for the hydrogen atom,
you get
G = (4 pi^2 r^3)/(M T^2) = 1.514172983E29
Following this on logically, are you saying G is a function of scale?
This is the bit I can't agree with.
I assume nothing at all.
I just apply the logical parameters that G was defined from.
Ref Georges Gamow "GRAVITY"
From that definition, G turns out not to be a constant at all.
Or else, maybe you can put a finger for me on where the mathematical
sequence is not proper.
André Michaud
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GRAVITATION
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION
- References:
- GRAVITATION
- From: киров
- Re: GRAVITATION
- From: kirov
- Re: GRAVITATION
- From: srp
- Re: GRAVITATION
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- GRAVITATION
- Prev by Date: Re: LHC due for 2007 start
- Next by Date: Re: GRAVITATION
- Previous by thread: Re: GRAVITATION
- Next by thread: Re: GRAVITATION
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
