Re: GRAVITATION
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 19:34:13 +0100
In article <4g81fnF1ll833U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, FrediFizzx
<fredifizzx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
André is saying that G is also a function of mass and time. And
following his logic more, means that gravity is unified with EM at the
atomic scale of mass, length and time. Interesting, but I can't figure
out what the symmetry breaking mechanism would be to allow gravity to
become separate from EM at bigger scales. There are some clues in
Moffat's recent research that G does vary in cosmological scales.
And what about in the inbetween cases as well? At what scale does G
change? How can G be that value at these scales, and how does it change
as you increase the scale?
--
The greatest enemy of science is pseudoscience.
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my *** poking forward, it is expanding.
Relf's Law?
"Bull*** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GRAVITATION
- From: FrediFizzx
- Re: GRAVITATION
- References:
- GRAVITATION
- From: киров
- Re: GRAVITATION
- From: kirov
- Re: GRAVITATION
- From: srp
- Re: GRAVITATION
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION
- From: FrediFizzx
- GRAVITATION
- Prev by Date: Re: GRAVITATION
- Next by Date: Re: LHC due for 2007 start
- Previous by thread: Re: GRAVITATION
- Next by thread: Re: GRAVITATION
- Index(es):