Electric force and charge
- From: "JoeT" <jhwht@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Jun 2006 05:07:18 -0700
Universal Forces: C. Electric Force and Charge
The universal forces I posted earlier have demonstrated again the
scientific principle that there is no free lunch in science. For
example, to continue to produce gravity neutrinos have to continue to
lose their kinetic energy to heavenly bodies having atomic and
molecular structures and stars have to continue to produce energetic
neutrinos. "Charge" should also be some kind of energy since
matters carrying "charge" constantly produce forces to interact
with other charged particles and matters. There are only two
fundamental particles, proton and electron, making up all atoms and
molecules and both are charged particles. Electric force and strong
nuclear force are the fundamental forces for making atoms and
molecules, which we owe our very existence.
Like gravity and other universal phenomena, charged particles need
constant supply of energy to maintain being charged. In the universe
the only energy source available everywhere is produced by all stars
carrying to the entire space of the universe by neutrinos. It is
therefore reasonable to conclude that charged particles constantly
obtain their energy supply from neutrinos too. Like planets, all
charged particles are low energy centers of the atmospheric neutrinos
of the universe, thus, having "gravity" of their own!
The existence of charged particles also means the presence of their
opposites or non-charge particles, which do not carry charge energy.
For example, neutrinos are non-charged particles. Upon removing charge
energies, charged particles such as proton and electron should have
their own non-charged core particles. I have named them "absolutely
uncharged particles (AUP)". Some AUPs, such as those of electron and
proton, may be much larger than neutrinos and have unique ability to
interact with neutrinos constantly gaining energy from them to become
constantly charged. Such AUPs should have an atmosphere of neutrinos
surrounding them having lower energy and denser concentration than
those of the atmospheric neutrinos of the universe like planets. An
AUP's neutrino atmosphere should get denser and lower in energy upon
approaching to its core or center. The neutrinos close to the core of
an AUP may be so dense and so low in energy that they may have some
ordered structures, becoming liquid-like for example. Having much
smaller size carrying equal amounts of charge energy to proton,
electron should have a much denser atmosphere of neutrinos than proton.
The above "energy aspects of charge" must agree with experimental
findings to be verified or disproved. Can it explain why there are
"positive and negative charges" and why the same charged particles
repulse and opposite charged attract each other? Findings have
concluded that proton and electron have equal amount of charge energies
but are opposite in signs.
The major difference between the two charged fundamental particles is
their sizes. Proton is much bigger than electron. The "attraction"
between them may be due to their having gravitational force. The same
charge particles have equal size and in this case the repulsing force
from their own atmosphere of neutrinos may be overwhelming their
gravitational forces.
How about explaining all other behaviors of charged particles? Having
their own atmosphere of neutrinos, which gets denser upon approaching
their AUP, we would expect that when proton and electron get closer to
each other, their repulsing force will continue to increase, thus,
preventing electron from falling into proton, e.g., to readily form
neutron, for example. Findings do show that a hydrogen structure is
more stable than a neutron structure. This energy concept for charged
particles offers an explanation why Coulomb's Law does not apply
inside atoms and molecules. Also, having a bulky atmosphere of
neutrinos should also be the reason why orbital electrons in atoms and
molecules can only take up quantized orbital. Besides, it explains why
electrons are very effective in interacting with the atmospheric
neutrinos of the universe to produce light, electric force, etc.
To the greatest surprise of the entire scientific community neutrinos
are very interactive. Besides producing all universal phenomena, they
interact with some AUPs to form charged particles, and then further
interact with charged particles to produce electric and magnetic forces
forming atoms, molecules, etc.
Now, upon the discovery of the atmospheric neutrinos to be the aether,
physics of mechanics offers a consistent common-sense making
interpretation of all universal forces, which are all produced by the
atmospheric neutrinos from their interactions with matters having
atomic and molecular structures. An overall scientific understanding of
the universal phenomena has further led to the scientific understanding
of the universe, which will be posted for discussing soon. Einstein
and many great physicists have long dreamed to have a unified theory of
all forces. They however can not achieve it by mathematics having wrong
science.
The Missions of my Posts
I would like to prove to the public that it is a mechanical world that
is logical and makes common sense by posting the follows topics one at
a time: real science, gravity, other universal forces, light and
universal red-shift, Microwave background, universe, stars, planetary
motions, particle physics, etc. Public understanding, debates and
actions are needed for the further development of the physics of
mechanics-based new aether science now in its infancy stage and to save
our science.
Physics of mechanics has been repeatedly proven to be the only real
(correct) science without unproved postulation in the past four
centuries. It has long predicted the presence of something (aether)
having masses and relative motions taking up all space in the universe
to produce universal phenomena. Recently, I have discovered that the
atmosphere of neutrinos is both the aether scientists have been looking
for centuries and the common scientific origin of all universal
phenomena. My discovery has expanded physics of mechanics to the
science of everything and again disproved all no-aether theories
including modern physics, which should be wrong to begin with since
they are based on postulations contradicting the teachings of physics
of mechanics. Like the ancient geocentric cosmology, both modern
physics and its modern cosmology are now proven to be a pseudo-science
based on unscientific postulations (those contradict the teachings of
physics of mechanics) and mathematic models.
It is time for physicists, cosmologists, astronomers, their scientific
communities, particularly the scientific research and education
agencies of our government such as NSF and NASA, which we all trust so
much, to bravely face the contradictions between physics of mechanics
and all the no-aether theories they have developed and accepted over
the past three centuries including modern physics and come back to real
science. Lets all welcome a scientific "quantum leap" from
religious beliefs and mathematic fantasies, to a simple consistent
coherent scientific understanding of the universe and universal
phenomena.
To save the credibility of the entire physics as a real science (and
the fundamental science of all fields of science), it is time for all
physicists to break their silence letting those pseudo-physicists to
continue to destroy real science. Please discuss my posts in meetings,
classrooms, and journals and boldly speak out to correct the
centuries-long scientific mistakes in physics and cosmology.
JoeT
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Electric force and charge
- From: Igor
- Re: Electric force and charge
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Electric force and charge
- Prev by Date: Re: (mechanical) Gravity
- Next by Date: Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?
- Previous by thread: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79: Superposition, Phases, Linearity
- Next by thread: Re: Electric force and charge
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
