Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?
- From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:22:57 GMT
<actionintegral@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1151504198.819686.168620@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Having followed these forums for a few months now, it appears to me
that
"crackpots" and "cranks" are people that are unable to find the errors
in their own logic.
Just my humble observation.
Not only are they unable to find the errors in their own logic,
they are most of all unable to admit or even *understand*
the errors in their own logic, even after having been explained
what is wrong with it *hundreds* of times. Explanations seem
to make it even worse.
Just look at Seto, Porat, Vergon, Wilson, Tomgee, Eleatis,
Webster, Wittke, Jones, etc etc etc...... and most of all at
Androcles:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORWildStab.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Gibberish.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XOROnceMore.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORrevisited.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORContinued.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/XORPersistence.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/LooksBoolean.html
Dirk Vdm
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?
- Next by Date: Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?
- Next by thread: Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?
- Index(es):
Loading