Re: Emotional Forces?
- From: "Zodness" <spamless@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:28:13 -0500
"platopes" <platopes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151525861.985365.167520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Zodness wrote:
"platopes" <platopes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151508861.255182.133210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
thought and emotion?
From whence thought and emotion? Did they (or the possibility of
their existence) exist in some tangible form in the first elements of
the universe, the way the leaf "exists" in the acorn?
We separate the tangible from the intangible for good reason, yet if
one becomes angry and smashes a Ming vase, the mind has impacted matter
as surely as the hand.
Sentient beings congregate to form groups/societies - planets
gravitate to form galaxies. In this way, gravitation might be viewed as
instinct or even a cure for the "loneliness" experienced by matter!
Yes yes, extremely flaky. I will now return to making wicker
furniture, and come back to see what you think. IOW, comments?
p
first elements of the universe,
leaf "exists" in the acorn?
tangible from the
angry and smashes a Ming vase,
impacted matter
Sentient beings congregate
planets gravitate
gravitation a cure for the "loneliness"
Tooo many topics, focus in and expand on one of them.
True enough...so, is it possible we differentiate between the
tangible and the intangible to a too great degree? That is, if the
intangible exists and has impact on the tangible, as it surely does,
perhaps the two are coupled in ways it behooves us to investigate.
For instance, in what way was the eventual existence of thought
embedded in the earliest elements?
I fully realise I may be into some serious conflation here...
the intangible does not exist;
Intangible definition;
1.. Incapable of being perceived by the senses.
2.. Incapable of being realized or defined
so it has no effect on the tangible, therefore there is no coupling, no
investigation behooved.
So you don't have to think such thoughts, which leads to clearity..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Emotional Forces?
- From: platopes
- Re: Emotional Forces?
- References:
- Emotional Forces?
- From: platopes
- Re: Emotional Forces?
- From: Zodness
- Re: Emotional Forces?
- From: platopes
- Emotional Forces?
- Prev by Date: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79: Superposition, Phases, Linearity As A Causal "Boundary Value Problem"
- Next by Date: Re: Electric force and charge
- Previous by thread: Re: Emotional Forces?
- Next by thread: Re: Emotional Forces?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|