Re: WTC explosion-plume TRAJECTORY -- 911

On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:43:26 -0500, Keith W <keithnospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Those 'minor fires' raged unchecked for several hours and what
Silverstein did was 'pull' emergency workers from a building
that was already doomed.

I note you have again failed to demonstrate any characteristics
of a controlled demolition can be identified.

Please enumerate what you consider to be characteristics of
controlled demolition.

Or do you prefer the Monty Python school of debate - I make
an assertion, you simply claim that it is false, with nothing
to support your counter claim.



Please answer the following questions

1) Why did nobody notice the prepratory weakening of the
structure ?

I don't know what you are referring to here.


2) Why did nobody , including the enhance security YOU claim
was present notice the explosives being positioned ?

Gee, do you think that having Marvin Bush as a board member of the
security firm in charge of WTC might have had something to do with
it? How do you know what was noticed, and what was reported?


3) Why did nobody spot the network of detonation cords ?

Perhaps they were concealed! I'm sure that any terrorists
clever enough to commandeer four jumbo jets and evade the U.S.
Air Force, might have had the presense of mind to cover up
those unsightly (and somewhat suspicious) det-cords. More
than likely, detonation timing was handled through radio or
network connections, not strands of trigger wires running all
over creation, which in itself would have taken a long time
to put in place.

And don't you think that presupposing detonation cords is
itself an unscientific assumption - a priori. Sort of like
the engineering studies done on the collapse, which started
with the assumption that the officially sponsored "theory"
was accurate, and all the engineers had to do was prove it
correct.


4) How did the explosives and det cords survive an intense fire
for a period of more than 30 minutes ?

Who said it did? There were reports of explosions several seconds
or minutes after the planes hit.


5) How could the explosives be positioned at precisely the
floors 2 barely controlled aircraft hit ?

Another a priori assumption. Your getting really good
at those. Is that what they teach you in engineering
school?


6) Why have none of the dozens of people involved in
laying such explosives come forward ?

I cannot speak for the thoughts and actions of others.
Perhaps a more fair question is why have members of
Al Qaeda, the Bush Administration, the CIA, or Israel's
Mosaad come forward to claim responsibility?

While some of them are undoubtedly evil, I would never
accuse any of them of being profoundly stupid.


In a country where the Prez couldnt cover up a consensual
sexual act with an intern a conspiracy the size of this
is literally incredible.

It doesn't appear that the cover-up is all that effective.
Without the unwitting aid of those in serious denial of
plain evidence, there probably would have been a series
of impeachments followed by public hangings.

Alas, there are people who genuinely DON'T WANT TO KNOW,
and get angry at anyone who theatens the security of
their plausible deniability. I don't know what your
motives are, or if you're just a fool. Either way
the results are the same.


Keith



--
Cheers,
Larry G.

Calling Austin HOME since 1982!
.

Loading