Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?

In article <MoadncwMfrappDnZRVnytA@xxxxxxxxx>, T Wake
<Usenet.es7AT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:290620061953283490%phineaspuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <1151605975.610852.165710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<"zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx"> wrote:

4/10 - shows promise, but doesn't really have a good idea of their
chosen direction of kookiness. Needs to try harder,

You're a fucking category theoriist, I knew it,
a double wank retard.

Yawn. Wake me when you make sense.


A terrible k00kfr0th there. I amazed you even graded him 4/10. The only
things going for him are his total lack of coherence between words. More
sex-related swear words required, possibly with some anti-Semitic /
anti-Nazi commentary. That would raise this k00kbaby to possibly 2/10.



I gave him two extra because I thought he might be going for the
surrealist angle ;-)

--
The greatest enemy of science is pseudoscience.

Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.

Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my *** poking forward, it is expanding.

Relf's Law?
"Bull*** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.

Loading