Re: Pulse Function
- From: "Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" <stoshu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 06:40:08 GMT
"Ron Baker, Pluralitas!" <stoshu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:D9Hog.21651$uy3.13045@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Martin" <mgcqso@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151546743.752976.3390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ron Baker, Pluralitas! wrote:
"Martin" <mgcqso@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151516006.155661.126380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<snip>
--
rb
Ron,
Thanks for the feedback. This is good news that you bring me. Once I
get straight on this, I will be able to solve a problem I have been
working on for months.
I have read a little bit on Laplace transforms. It doesn't seem to be
very complicated. But I'm still unsure of how to proceed in setting up
the factor g(x) such that it is 1 for a given range and otherwise zero.
If the curve along 0 < X < 10 is x^2, what exactly would g(x) be?
Martin
u(x) - u(10-x)
Bugger. I got that wrong.
It should be:
u(x) - u(x-10)
Which is equal to:
u(x) * u(10-x)
--
rb
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pulse Function
- From: john
- Re: Pulse Function
- References:
- Pulse Function
- From: Martin
- Re: Pulse Function
- From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
- Re: Pulse Function
- From: Martin
- Re: Pulse Function
- From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
- Pulse Function
- Prev by Date: Re: Pulse Function
- Next by Date: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 81: Sir Isaac and Leibniz Come Out Ahead of Fermat in Nonrenormalization Exponentiation
- Previous by thread: Re: Pulse Function
- Next by thread: Re: Pulse Function
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|