sci.physics
- PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 783 June 30, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi,
Sam Wormley
- Thoughts on why space must have three dimensions,
Neil
- "Examining Mathematical Approaches",
Dlo
- Is there a relationship between optical band gap and activation energy?,
JAH
- electrostatic,
Ludo
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 81: Sir Isaac and Leibniz Come Out Ahead of Fermat in Nonrenormalization Exponentiation,
OsherD
- Which version of it? :-),
Math Freak
- Twenty Five minutes? :-),
Math Freak
- Job opening for physics outreach,
Clint Sprott
- Porous materials can have unusual properties,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Squeezin' Balls in Those Hallowed Halls -- Oh, My Achin' Testacles!,
donstockbauer
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 80: 1 + y - x Conversion of QM E = hv,
OsherD
- Principle of greatest time,
gmarkowsky
- How Refrigerators Work,
W. Watson
- Re: Consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys _Everything_.,
T Wake
- Re: Stop the "1 degree temperature increase" LIE. Stop psychopathically Lying!,
Rene Tschaggelar
- "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light",
Dlo
- Re: WTC explosion-plume TRAJECTORY -- 911,
LarryG
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79.1: Superposition, Phases, Linearity As A Causal "Boundary Value Problem",
OsherD
- method to sort semiconductor carbon nanotubes by size,
Sam Wormley
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79: Superposition, Phases, Linearity As A Causal "Boundary Value Problem",
OsherD
- Study Shows San Andreas Primed for Major Quake,
Sam Wormley
- A Hydrogen Suitcase,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Some advice on table I made..,
Martin Hogbin
- Pulse Function,
Martin
- Re: How find focal length of lens at home?,
Greg Hansen
- Emotional Forces?,
platopes
- Non Contact (Optical) Pyrometer & Exhaust Gas Temperature,
mrmain
- Electric force and charge,
JoeT
- Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 79: Superposition, Phases, Linearity,
OsherD
- Quantum Bomb - x-dimensional harmonic oscillator zero point energy of a vortex,
switzerland qunatium computer
- GPS TRACKS EARTH'S INSTANTANEOUS POLE,
Sam Wormley
- atmospheric pressures,
mrdarrett
- Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
PD
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Rene Tschaggelar
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Andy Resnick
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
PD
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
PD
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
T Wake
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
cmaj10
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
actionintegral
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
platopes
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Igor
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Mike
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
Greg Hansen
- The real kooks.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Is it possible to be an important and influential amateur physicist?,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Metric Dictionary?,
Hatunen
US Supreme Court to Tackle Warming,
Sam Wormley
puzzle,
Vichu
EMF inducing Fluorescent Effects,
Sivas09
Hydraulic Presses and Force,
Dennis B
friction problem,
mcldias
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 782 June 27, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi,
Sam Wormley
"The Brilliance of Our Teachers",
Dlo
dedanoe defines trajectory,
dedanoe
traveling witouth moving,
dedanoe
Unifications of entropies,
kunzmilan
Halo nuclei,
Sam Wormley
Pale swirls on the surface of the Moon,
Sam Wormley
"Seeing" X-rays,
mike3
Re: Classical vs. Quantum?,
dweller
SCI.PHYSICS, FUCK YOUR ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,
borje
New: mind reading computers,
Jan Panteltje
Simple Exercise - Jet Engine, Mass of Air Thru Turbine,
BrainDumb
Energy Cost of Ethanol,
Greg Hansen
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Message not availableRe: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
glhansen@xxxxxxx
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
Timo A. Nieminen
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
cnctut
Re: Energy Cost of Ethanol,
glhansen@xxxxxxx
IN ENGLISCH:A table of Mechanics. Schema:,
NILS BÖRJESSON
IN SWEDISCH:Mekanikens indelning. Schema:,
NILS BÖRJESSON
Understanding Bernoulli's Equation,
actionintegral
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC,
Andy Resnick
"The Right Angle Lever Paradox",
Dlo
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 26, 2006,
PhDs . org Webmaster
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales.,
Ken S. Tucker
Nanotechnology is the ultimate cure,
Radium
A Small Miracle,
stargene
Re: takes 1.5 gallons gasoline to produce 1 gallon ethanol in modern agriculture,
mmeron
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 78: dy/dt = ky(1 + y),
OsherD
Radionics and Orgone Technology,
streetsanto@xxxxxxxxx
Your "Domestic Terrorists" of tomorrow :-),
Math Freak
A word about most of you :-),
Math Freak
Somebody whining? :-),
Math Freak
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 77: The Universe as a Superposition of Two Real Normalized Phases x ( > = 0) or y( > = 0) and 1 - x or 1 - y,
OsherD
"How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?",
Egap
The Moving Dimensions problem,
NR
Re: THE GRAVITON DOESNT EXIST,
Eric Gisse
How big would it have to be?,
mike3
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 76: 1/(1 + y - x) and Feynman Again,
OsherD
Re: is entropy the Faraday law analog or the Ampere law analog Re:,
boson boss
On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces,
yinbing-zhou
Re: Why sending a signal, or travel, back in time can't be done,
New way to factor?,
jstevh
- Re: New way to factor?,
mmeron
- Re: New way to factor?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: New way to factor?,
T Wake
- Re: New way to factor?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: New way to factor?,
T Wake
- Re: New way to factor?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: New way to factor?,
T Wake
- Re: New way to factor?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: New way to factor?,
T Wake
- Re: New way to factor?,
Ken Oath
- Re: New way to factor?,
T Wake
- Re: New way to factor?,
Richard Tobin
- Re: New way to factor?,
mmeron
- Re: New way to factor?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: New way to factor?,
mmeron
- Re: New way to factor?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: New way to factor?,
mmeron
- Re: New way to factor?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: New way to factor?,
mmeron
- Re: New way to factor?,
Bernhard Kuemel
- Re: New way to factor?,
jstevh
- Re: New way to factor?,
cnctut
- Re: New way to factor?,
Jan Panteltje
Re: Star Distances,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
You can catch THEM :-),
Math Freak
the simplest system of units of measure,
donaldsauter
Jeff_Relf needs your vote!,
Phineas T Puddleduck
universal forces,
JoeT
Re: relatively confusing,
Dirk Van de moortel
Here's the Entropy_Time_Space model... back by popular demand...,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Here's the Entropy_Time_Space model... back by popular demand...,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Here's the Entropy_Time_Space model... back by popular demand...,
T Wake
- Re: Here's the Entropy_Time_Space model... back by popular demand...,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Like a lit match, consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys you.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Like a lit match, consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys you.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Like a lit match, consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys you.,
T Wake
- Re: Like a lit match, consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys you.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Like a lit match, consumption ( dissipation/entropy ) creates/destroys you.,
CrankHunter
- What's your job, Crank_Seeker ?,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: What's your job, Crank_Seeker ?,
Crank Hunter
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 75.1: PI and Space-time Averages of Gravitational/Classical Fields,
OsherD
Re: needs insight for de Broglie relation,
Greg Hansen
Re: Why no relativistic QM of fixed particle number?,
Greg Hansen
LHC due for 2007 start,
Sam Wormley
Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Jun 06 Washington, DC,
Eric Gisse
Re: mattress keeps inching off of bed,
Mohab
? complex elec permittivity,
Cheng Cosine
diFFerential-equations with symmetry that gives two invariants!,
NILS BÖRJESSON
Need a precise ammeter?,
Glenn Møller-Holst
here or there contd...(simultaineity for the third time!!!),
oldton
"The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe",
Egap
OT: Pluto's Twins Get Their Names (Nix and Hydra),
Sam Wormley
Asshole of the month boilerplate,
Tom Potter
Newton is a shithead,
dedanoe
how do stars get born?,
dedanoe
I've got too many things on my plate right now.,
Jeff…Relf
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 72: Bianchi Identity Type Creates A New Kind of "Imaginary" Number,
OsherD
Single-electron counter breaks new record,
Sam Wormley
Re: takes 1.5 gallons gasoline to produce 1 gallon ethanol in modern agriculture,
Externet
Conservation of light energy...,
Externet
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi,
OsherD
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi,
Spice Malenge
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi,
donstockbauer
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi,
OsherD
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi,
Spice Malenge
- Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 71: (1/3)[f(x,y) + f(y,z) + f(z,x)] = f(x,x) and PI and Bianchi,
OsherD
Re: 350 Ghz room temp chips will transmit movie in five seconds,
Edward Green
Gore Slams Global Warming Critics,
tadchem
Re: Lunar Space Elevator simply isn't for everyone,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Two up quarks and one down quark.,
malibu
Re: Gravity - Caused by GR curvature or gravitons?,
Sam Wormley
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 19 June 2006 http://focus.aps.org/,
Sam Wormley
Re: --off topic --Is Ann Coulter a Terrorist?,
hhc314
Paper: Bug juice - harvesting electricity with microorganisms,
Robert Karl Stonjek
? find wave field using fft,
Cheng Cosine
Space Travel consequences,
zach
Truth or Hoax?,
rangeravenger
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 781 June 19, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi,
Sam Wormley
Newton?,
sensible
"Retic Postings and SPAM",
Egap
Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Igor
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Sorcerer
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Igor
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
actionintegral
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
T Wake
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
actionintegral
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
actionintegral
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
actionintegral
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
PD
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Timo A. Nieminen
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
- Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Timo A. Nieminen
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Edward Green
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
Re: Science Myths Part 1: Bernoulli's Principle,
Dennis B
here or there??,
oldton
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 19, 2006,
PhDs . org Webmaster
How quantum a sub-particle is?,
Jack
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?,
malibu
Re: How quantum a sub-particle is?,
Glenn Møller-Holst
Re: Peking man is considered by many experts to be the,
Edward Green
Can the anthropic principle be scientific?,
Robert
Six Carbon atoms sharing twelve electrons.,
malibu
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 70: Logistic vs Lotka-Volterra vs Competition,
OsherD
Re: A question to Paul Draper (PD),
Y.Porat
Re: I'm benching 2.5/.35 Mbps, i.e. 2.5 Mega bits per second down, .35 Mbps up.,
T Wake
"Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?",
Yad
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 69: Lotka-Volterra Equations,
OsherD
GRAVITATION,
киров
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- <Possible follow-ups>
- GRAVITATION,
киров
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: GRAVITATION,
kirov
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
FrediFizzx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
FrediFizzx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
FrediFizzx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Sue...
- Re: GRAVITATION,
FrediFizzx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Sue...
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
FrediFizzx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
PhineasPuddleduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
FrediFizzx
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Y.Porat
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: GRAVITATION,
srp
- Re: GRAVITATION,
Y.Porat
Message not available
Re: I should submit a bug report to Google.,
Edward Green
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Modeling nature herself, God.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Modeling nature herself, God.,
T Wake
- Eintein endlessly asserted that dice/nature are/is pseudorandom.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Eintein endlessly asserted that dice/nature are/is pseudorandom.,
T Wake
- Re: Eintein endlessly asserted that dice/nature are/is pseudorandom.,
Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone.,
Brad Guth
- Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone.,
T Wake
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone.,
Brad Guth
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone.,
T Wake
Re: T_Puddleduck, I'll edit the Einstein page after you're long gone.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableEither mars is too cold, venus is too hot, or we're too picky.,
Jeff…Relf
Re: physics or mathematics of musical scales,
Ken S. Tucker
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 68: dy/dt = y(1 - x), dx/dt = x(1 - y),
OsherD
Re: Test,
Greg Neill
"A Snapshot of a Photon",
Yad
(mechanical) Gravity,
JoeT
Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
FrediFizzx
Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
Message not available
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
Mike
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
JoeT
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
Mike
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
FrediFizzx
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
JoeT
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
JoeT
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
JoeT
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
PD
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
JoeT
- Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
Eric Gisse
Re: (mechanical) Gravity,
Y.Porat
Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Scientific Errors (Revision),
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Thomas Smid
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Greg Neill
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Sorcerer
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Sorcerer
- Re: Scientific Errors,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Sorcerer
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Sorcerer
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Jim Black
- Re: Scientific Errors,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Scientific Errors,
CWatters
- Re: Scientific Errors,
PD
- Re: Scientific Errors,
blair . houghton
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Thomas Smid
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Thomas Smid
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Thomas Smid
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
mmeron
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Thomas Smid
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Thomas Smid
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Thomas Smid
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Thomas Smid
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Scientific Errors,
jimp
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Scientific Errors,
jimp
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
jimp
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Message not available
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
T Wake
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
- Re: Scientific Errors,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Scientific Errors,
Dennis B
Chemists have fashioned tiny dots of carbon that glow in response to light,
Sam Wormley
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 67: dy/dt = 1 + y - x for x = t,
OsherD
Spitzer Finds Distant Clusters of Galaxies,
Sam Wormley
Not exactly rocket science but...,
jt64
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 16 Jun 06 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
spinning coin animation for C6H12,
ma1ibu
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 66: Cross-Logistic Modified/Generalized Equations Continued,
OsherD
"Gravity",
Yad
Re: Clean room--definition?,
Randy Poe
Repulsion binds atoms,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Edward Green
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Edward Green
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
ma1ibu
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Edward Green
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Edward Green
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Edward Green
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Ken S. Tucker
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Edward Green
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
malibu
- Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Ken Muldrew
Re: Repulsion binds atoms,
Y.Porat
? why can one solve Helmholtz eqn in one z-dir along,
Cheng Cosine
Re: THE MECHANICS OF THE UNIVERSE,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Blackbody spectrum,
Giorgio Pastore
Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope,
top9
God likes curses,
kurtstocklmeir
"The Source of Gravitational Energy",
Yad
Decomposers,
uri
Scientists have discovered a novel form of solid carbon dioxide,
Sam Wormley
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 65: (Convolution) Integral Equations,
OsherD
Cosmic background uniformity,
Tony M
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 64: Causation As Generalized Time-Convolution in Functional Analysis,
OsherD
Secret negotiations gone bad? :-),
Math Freak
Quantum physics - Collapse of quantum wavefunction,
PaulHjelmstad
The first physics equation,
MobyDikc
"The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics",
Yad
Smells like dog spirit,
dedanoe
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 63: If Subtraction is More Fundamental Than Integration vs Differentiation, Then What Happens to Functional Analysis?,
OsherD
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 62: A Strange Aspect of Sir Isaac, Leibniz, and Fermat,
OsherD
I am confused on this problem,
Preston
what is quantum diagonal?,
Orki
Newton's 2nd Law Problem...,
CarpeDiem . InVino
"Will the LIGO Experiment Work?",
Yad
A NEW KIND OF ACOUSTIC LASER,
Sam Wormley
TESTING A UNIVERSAL SYMMETRY,
Sam Wormley
Large matrix calculation,
DanielK
Faster than light? Don't be in the dark.,
will1
REQ: Coud anyone post the audio CD's of - The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. 5 thru 8 ?,
dweller
Question about nucleosynthesis,
Radium
"The Einstein Hoax",
Yad
OMEGA of the thermal field, T=2.7 K is 2/3,
NILS BÖRJESSON
What is the error in my calculation?,
Ronald RNR
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Ronald RNR
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
mmeron
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
panteltje
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
T Wake
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
T Wake
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Sorcerer
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
srp
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
CWatters
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Ronald RNR
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
FrediFizzx
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
panteltje
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
T Wake
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
CWatters
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Rock Brentwood
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: What is the error in my calculation?,
Max Keon
On Holism and Emergence,
Sir Frederick
newtonian physics thought excercise,
jdesoto79
God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- <Possible follow-ups>
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
- God is pure,
kurtstocklmeir
My letter to the newYork Times about: ''A Ring Tone Meant to Fall on Deaf Ears'',
Jan Panteltje
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 12, 2006,
PhDs . org Webmaster
Standard Snowflake Question,
Sir Frederick
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 61: Measures including M(X),
OsherD
Slow load vs Fast load,
Linda
Smoking Gun Graph for Global Warming?,
W. Watson
Signed Feynman items on EBAY,
Gery Scott
Time & Space Dimensions - why different?,
delversisogna
Freeman Dyson--Nuclear Reactors,
W. Watson
Freemand and George Dyson,
W. Watson
can't remeber the name...,
zomoco1
Re: Apollo's 50,000 rad gamma moon walk,
Brad Guth
Bermuda Triangle,
Vichu
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 60: Reminder About Renormalization and Look At 59 Again,
OsherD
Physics Olympiad :-),
Math Freak
"The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems",
Bew
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 59: Individualism vs Bureaucracy, Locality, Decomposed Functional Analysis,
OsherD
Flourishing fast :-),
Math Freak
Why is charge quantized?,
Henning Makholm
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 58: Decomposition of Functional Analysis,
OsherD
collision between two two-dimensional lines,
bgold
Simple question about curving soccer balls,
Jeffrey Rolland
Guys if you have savings....,
Math Freak
Hurry up toward Downtown :-),
Math Freak
Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Tom Potter
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Sam Wormley
- Message not available
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Tom Potter
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Tom Potter
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Mike
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
tdp1001
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Tom Potter
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Mike
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
tdp1001
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
mmeron
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Tom Potter
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Tom Potter
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Tom Potter
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Where is ahaha.... ahahahanson?,
Eric Gisse
"Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?",
Bew
Re: ANALOGY BETWEEN THERMODYNAMICS AND RELATIVITY,
donstockbauer
How do we measure a bushel?,
Petrovitch
Brilliant conversation of the year award - nomination for.,
Sorcerer
physicists say it is possible to build a tiny refrigerator,
Sam Wormley
Properties of solutions,
matt13601
Re: I'm elated that WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein is locked up.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
"Fusion never will be practical.",
FED UP
Quantization of thermal spectra from planets,
PD
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 9 Jun 06 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
Re: The 13.7 light-years to the start of the observable universe.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Zarqawi did not die instantly,
asdf
Satellite in starry sky,
neo
Re: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein has been frozen by a root-level sysop.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Breaking the Light Barrier,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: NO MASS - NO REAL PHYSICS OF FORCES !!,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Shaking causes aftershocks,
Sam Wormley
Re: What would I gain from running destop Linux ?,
Kelsey Bjarnason
Why is deuterium-tritium fusion preferable to deuterium-deuterium fusion?,
Radium
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 780 June 9, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi,
Sam Wormley
"The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets",
Bew
Solar Energy To Be Taxed,
Rhodo Dendron
Electron composition and electron division,
rim317-ava
Graphical Error Analysis,
D. Baruth
Re: Strong and weak nuclear forces,
Rock Brentwood
Electric Quadrupole,
abhishek_HBK
Mobile phone location based services,
Hugh Pearce
speed of electricity,
Chrisd5000rouge
Fundamental composition of matter?,
rim317-ava
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website",
Bew
Impossible device at work?,
RXguy
GPS idea,
Abstract Dissonance
new On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces,
yinbing-zhou
Fluid Flow vs Heat Transfer II,
Dan in Philly
real science,
JoeT
effect of golf club on a ball,
john0714@xxxxxxx
Re: Jeff's confusion,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: The Jaffa vs. Jaffas.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
--(*)-(*)-- // NEED a LEATHER Halter Top? -------------------------------------------------------,
Kirk Gregory Czuhai
A Realistic Nuclear-powered 400nm laser,
Radium
Most impressive footage I have ever seen of a Serious Landslide.......Japan,
Hansi
blackbody spectra,
David Macmanus
"The Nature of Mass",
Bew
Re: Source of dirt on the moon? (bootprint...),
mfunke
Re: Asteroid to strike India in 2036,
Rene Tschaggelar
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 57: PI is Non-Hilbert Functional Analysis,
OsherD
Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Martha
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Greg Hansen
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Dave
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
The Sorcerer
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T PuddleDuck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Dave
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Greg Hansen
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
PD
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
T Wake
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
srp
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
glhansen@xxxxxxx
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
glhansen@xxxxxxx
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
glhansen@xxxxxxx
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Marc
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Mike
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Dave
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Quantum Mechanics: established fact?,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Approximately how high of a temperature is required to generated an antineutron,
Radium
Magnetic field strength in water,
paul
Neutron-antineutron vs. Proton-antiproton,
Radium
Electron vibration and Photons,
Radium
Re: FRAUDULENT "SPOG FREAK" POSTS,
Robert Weldon
Elegant Derivation of Lorentz Transformation?,
hetware
God is fair,
kurtstocklmeir
"Do Virtual Photons Exist?",
Bew
Newbee question, Warum Things fall the downward, not the upward?,
Ollie Fant Newbee
Re: [OT] Stamp values and postal prices - rather puzzling,
CWatters
How does multiplying by lightspeed squared make any sense?,
Uno Lapideus
THE MATRIX IS PERFECT MORE COMPLEX THEN THE UNIVERSE,
switzerland qunatium computer
derive this formula,
bgold
Re: Educated professionals,
Sam Wormley
Continuous space and time,
Charlie
Questions about nuclear fusion and elements made of anti-particles,
Radium
Re: When Galaxies Collide (best they both be regular matter),
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: All you [Hammond] detractors are the same Re: EIGENVECTOR OF THE GODS,
Marc Goodman
QV/2 exactly half input energy QV?,
hetware
Andromeda Adrift in Sea of Dust in New NASA Image,
Sam Wormley
"Evidence of the Existence of the Aether",
Bew
Re: Einstein's Relativity and Everyday Life -- Clifford M. Will,
Eric Gisse
Testing Special Relativity and Newtonian Gravity,
Sam Wormley
New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 05, 2006,
PhDs . org Webmaster
Re: Greek letters.,
Timo A. Nieminen
Schrodinger's Equation,
mitch
Magnetism Lorentz Geometry and Electron Field,
hetware
Is quantum state collapse in contradiction with the store of QBits?,
Fakewings
Fusion-pumped lasers,
Radium
Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?,
Radium
- Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?,
Fembot
- Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?,
jimp
- Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?,
Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?,
Timo Nieminen
- Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?,
Tom Potter
- Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?,
Radium
- Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?,
The Sorcerer
- Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?,
PD
- Re: Why is the amplitude of light never discussed?,
srp
Negative Analog of Proton?,
Radium
Electron-orbits, light-wavelength and amplitude,
Radium
electric charge in time-variable magnetic field,
mich
Re: Correct way to write 24 hour-time? Decimalpoint too.,
The Sorcerer
Re: Is Nanonuclear-fusion possible?,
Radium
Lazy Invariance Question,
Edward Green
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
mmeron
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
Henning Makholm
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
mmeron
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
Henning Makholm
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
mmeron
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
Henning Makholm
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
mmeron
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
Henning Makholm
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
mmeron
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
Edward Green
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
mmeron
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
Edward Green
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
mmeron
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
Edward Green
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
mmeron
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
Edward Green
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
Y.Porat
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Lazy Invariance Question,
Bruce Scott TOK
Re: Newtonian physics derived from P'(t)=0=E'(t),
hetware
physics,
Lisa Goose
On the Physical -- Was: Understanding the Action Integral,
Edward Green
Re: EMRP Gravity Theory,
Aetherist
"Corrections to Special Relativity",
Klim
curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- Re: curses,
Igor
- <Possible follow-ups>
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- Re: curses,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Herring, Puddleduck, T_Wake and Gisse have no experience with complex systems.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Herring, Puddleduck, T_Wake and Gisse have no experience with complex systems.,
Eric Gisse
- I have the people skills to match my computing skills.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: I have the people skills to match my computing skills.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: I have the people skills to match my computing skills.,
T Wake
- Re: I have the people skills to match my computing skills.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Herring, Puddleduck, T_Wake and Gisse have no experience with complex systems.,
Richard Herring
- Re: Herring, Puddleduck, T_Wake and Gisse have no experience with complex systems.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Herring, Puddleduck, T_Wake and Gisse have no experience with complex systems.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Herring, Puddleduck, T_Wake and Gisse have no experience with complex systems.,
T Wake
- Re: Herring, Puddleduck, T_Wake and Gisse have no experience with complex systems.,
T Wake
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
- curses,
kurtstocklmeir
Swing and momentum,
BernardZ
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Edward Green
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Henning Makholm
- Re: Swing and momentum,
briggs
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Henning Makholm
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Edward Green
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Edward Green
- Re: Swing and momentum,
mmeron
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Edward Green
- Re: Swing and momentum,
mmeron
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Edward Green
- Re: Swing and momentum,
mmeron
- Message not available
- Re: Swing and momentum,
CWatters
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Edward Green
- Message not available
- Re: Swing and momentum,
CWatters
- Message not available
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Henning Makholm
- Message not available
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Henning Makholm
- Re: Swing and momentum,
CWatters
- Re: Swing and momentum,
briggs
- Re: Swing and momentum,
CWatters
- Message not available
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Henning Makholm
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Edward Green
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Henning Makholm
- Message not available
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Henning Makholm
- Re: Swing and momentum,
Edward Green
Message not availableRe: Swing and momentum,
mmeron
Message not availableRe: Swing and momentum,
Timo A. Nieminen
Re: Swing and momentum,
Edward Green
Re: Swing and momentum,
Henning Makholm
Re: Swing and momentum,
Mike
Re: Swing and momentum,
tadchem
>>>>>>Matrix Computing to Infinite Universes<<<<<<<<,
switzerland qunatium computer
>>>>>>Matrix Computing to Infinte Universes<<<<<<<<,
switzerland qunatium computer
On scientific publishing,
ytyourclothes
Three Colored Dye Experiment,
Zitterbewegung
Sub-atomic particles and spin,
Mike Speed
New carbon ring animation,
ma1ibu
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 56: Big Bang Moves To Infinity To Zero As Time --> Infinity,
OsherD
Where did the big bang happen.,
clemenr
- Re: Where did the big bang happen.,
T Wake
- Re: Where did the big bang happen.,
PD
- Re: Where did the big bang happen.,
srp
- Re: Where did the big bang happen.,
The Sorcerer
- Re: Where did the big bang happen.,
Bob Cain
- The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.,
CrankHater
- Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.,
Phineas T PuddleDuck
- Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory.,
Phineas T PuddleDuck
- The observed universe, before it cooled to Planck temperture.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: The observed universe, before it cooled to Planck temperture.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: The observed universe, before it cooled to Planck temperture.,
CrankHater
- Re: The observed universe, before it cooled to Planck temperture.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: The observed universe, before it cooled to Planck temperture.,
T Wake
- Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory.,
T Wake
- Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory.,
T Wake
- Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory.,
Phineas T PuddleDuck
- Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory.,
T Wake
- Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory.,
T Wake
- Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory.,
T Wake
- Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory.,
Bob Cain
- Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory.,
PD
- Re: Cosmology includes high-energy physics and M-theory.,
T Wake
- Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.,
T Wake
- T_Wake will soon be gone.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: T_Wake will soon be gone.,
CrankHater
- Re: T_Wake will soon be gone.,
T Wake
- Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.,
CrankHater
- Re: The cosmos doesn't happen, it just is.,
T Wake
- General_Relativity's Lambda scalar.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: General_Relativity's Lambda scalar.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: General_Relativity's Lambda scalar.,
T Wake
- The numbers I used came from WikiPedia, NASA and SNLS.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: The numbers I used came from WikiPedia, NASA and SNLS.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- The local anisotropies in the CMBR.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: The local anisotropies in the CMBR.,
T Wake
- Re: The local anisotropies in the CMBR.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- The cosmic inflation theory is worse than sci-fi.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: The cosmic inflation theory is worse than sci-fi.,
CrankHater
- Re: The cosmic inflation theory is worse than sci-fi.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: The cosmic inflation theory is worse than sci-fi.,
T Wake
- The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- The pre-observable universe was once infinitely Hot/Dense/InterCausal.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: The pre-observable universe was once infinitely Hot/Dense/InterCausal.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: The pre-observable universe was once infinitely Hot/Dense/InterCausal.,
T Wake
- Re: The pre-observable universe was once infinitely Hot/Dense/InterCausal.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension.,
Brad Guth
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Brad Guth is now a cosmologist - news at 11!,
Brad Guth
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: Brad Guth is now a cosmologist - news at 11!,
Brad Guth
Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension.,
T Wake
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: Cosmic_Inflation is a bit of Trans_Planck_Length voodoo.,
Timberwoof
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is a bit of Trans_Planck_Length voodoo.,
T Wake
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is a bit of Trans_Planck_Length voodoo.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension.,
Eric Gisse
Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension.,
T Wake
Re: The 13.7 billion light-year length denotes a fifth spatial dimension.,
T Wake
T_Wake, can't you count that high ?,
Jeff…Relf
Re: T_Wake, can't you count that high ?,
T Wake
The width of the _Observable_ universe is 158 light-years and counting.,
Jeff…Relf
Message not availableCosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
Jeff…Relf
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
T Wake
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: The direction of time and entropy are irrelevant.,
T Wake
Kid kids in a pre-school playground, all you can do is call people names.,
Jeff…Relf
Re: Kid kids in a pre-school playground, all you can do is call people names.,
T Wake
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: Erwin_Moller, Flame on... see where that gets you.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
T Wake
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
T Wake
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
T Wake
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
T Wake
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
T Wake
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
T Wake
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
T Wake
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
Eric Gisse
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Cosmic_Inflation is an artificial model of the Planck_Length transition...,
Eric Gisse
Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad.,
Jeff…Relf
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad.,
CrankHater
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Duckie, why is your butt expanding ?,
Jeff…Relf
Re: Duckie, why is your butt expanding ?,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad.,
T Wake
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad.,
T Wake
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad.,
Jeff…Relf
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad.,
Phineas T Puddleduck
Re: Food, Good... Becoming Food, Ba-a-ad.,
T Wake
Re: The cosmic inflation theory is worse than sci-fi.,
T Wake
Re: The numbers I used came from WikiPedia, NASA and SNLS.,
T Wake
I like T.J. proper, not his money.,
Jeff…Relf
Re: I like T.J. proper, not his money.,
T Wake
Re: I like T.J. proper, not his money.,
Jeff…Relf
Re: I like T.J. proper, not his money.,
T Wake
Re: Mathematical Proof of non-Galilean Time given Constant Lightspeed,
The Sorcerer
How much energy does radium produce?,
Protoman
- Re: How much energy does radium produce?,
mmeron
- Re: How much energy does radium produce?,
Protoman
- Re: How much energy does radium produce?,
mmeron
- Re: How much energy does radium produce?,
Protoman
- Re: How much energy does radium produce?,
mmeron
- Re: How much energy does radium produce?,
Protoman
- Re: How much energy does radium produce?,
mmeron
- Re: How much energy does radium produce?,
Protoman
- Re: How much energy does radium produce?,
mmeron
- Re: How much energy does radium produce?,
Protoman
- Re: How much energy does radium produce?,
mmeron
- Re: How much energy does radium produce?,
mmeron
- Re: How much energy does radium produce?,
PD
fission stars?,
joshipura
Re: T_Wake, ask your buddies what the standard model of cosmology is.,
Phineas T PuddleDuck
- Re: T_Wake, ask your buddies what the standard model of cosmology is.,
T Wake
- Re: T_Wake, ask your buddies what the standard model of cosmology is.,
Phineas T PuddleDuck
- You can't model the cosmos using just four dimensions.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: You can't model the cosmos using just four dimensions.,
T Wake
- Re: You can't model the cosmos using just four dimensions.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: You can't model the cosmos using just four dimensions.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: You can't model the cosmos using just four dimensions.,
T Wake
- The U.S. has the Apollo moon landings, GlobalStar, Iridium...,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: The U.S. has the Apollo moon landings, GlobalStar, Iridium...,
Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: The U.S. has the Apollo moon landings, GlobalStar, Iridium...,
Ken Oath
- Re: The U.S. has the Apollo moon landings, GlobalStar, Iridium...,
Phineas T PuddleDuck
- Re: The U.S. has the Apollo moon landings, GlobalStar, Iridium...,
Eric Gisse
- Usenet first became fast back in 1991.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Usenet first became fast back in 1991.,
T Wake
- The lack of Brits at ESA.INT.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: The U.S. has the Apollo moon landings, GlobalStar, Iridium...,
T Wake
- Re: You can't model the cosmos using just four dimensions.,
Phineas T PuddleDuck
- Re: You can't model the cosmos using just four dimensions.,
Phineas T PuddleDuck
- The future is just as immutable as the past.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: The future is just as immutable as the past.,
Phineas T PuddleDuck
- A lot of people didn't like Darwin's ideas either.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: A lot of people didn't like Darwin's ideas either.,
T Wake
- T_Wake has no idea what does or does not contradict experimental evidence.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: T_Wake has no idea what does or does not contradict experimental evidence.,
T Wake
- Re: The future is just as immutable as the past.,
T Wake
- Re: The future is just as immutable as the past.,
Phineas T PuddleDuck
- Re: The future is just as immutable as the past.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: The future is just as immutable as the past.,
T Wake
- Like a retarded preschooler, all T_Wake can do is harangue me here.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Like a retarded preschooler, all T_Wake can do is harangue me here.,
Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: Like a retarded preschooler, all T_Wake can do is harangue me here.,
T Wake
- Re: Like a retarded preschooler, all T_Wake can do is harangue me here.,
Phineas T PuddleDuck
- Message not available
- [OT] Tom, Dick and Jane (Was Re: Like a retarded ...),
T Wake
- Re: [OT] Tom, Dick and Jane (Was Re: Like a retarded ...),
Phineas T PuddleDuck
- Re: [OT] Tom, Dick and Jane (Was Re: Like a retarded ...),
T Wake
- Dicking == F_cking.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Dicking == F_cking.,
T Wake
- Making the word dick a verb is not unlike making the word Google a verb.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Making the word dick a verb is not unlike making the word Google a verb.,
CrankHater
- Re: Making the word dick a verb is not unlike making the word Google a verb.,
T Wake
- I'm going to give her a good dicking.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: I'm going to give her a good dicking.,
T Wake
- Re: The future is just as immutable as the past.,
Eric Gisse
Re: Noether's Theorem,
Herman Trivilino
Re: hbar=1, charge and other quantities in diminsions of length and time.,
The Sorcerer
My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
FED UP
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Sam Wormley
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Sam Wormley
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Sam Wormley
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Sam Wormley
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Sam Wormley
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Sam Wormley
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Sam Wormley
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Sam Wormley
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Sam Wormley
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Sam Wormley
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Sam Wormley
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Greg Hansen
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Sam Wormley
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Sam Wormley
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
T Wake
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Greg Hansen
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Max Keon
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Sam Wormley
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
FED UP
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
mmeron
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
mmeron
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
mmeron
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
mmeron
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
mmeron
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
mmeron
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
mmeron
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
mmeron
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Greg Hansen
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
mmeron
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
mmeron
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
mmeron
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Greg Hansen
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
jimp
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
mmeron
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Greg Hansen
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Greg Hansen
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Greg Hansen
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Sam Wormley
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Radium
- Re: My Favorite Laser,
Greg Hansen
Re: My Favorite Laser,
nightlight
Re: The moon's surface had 1.25 millirads per _Hour_.,
Brad Guth
need to calculate DIRECTION-VECTORS,
liav . ezer
"Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?",
Klim
Quantum-Dot Leap: Tapping tiny crystals' inexplicable light-harvesting talent,
Sam Wormley
String Trio: Novel instrument strums like guitar, rings like bell,
Sam Wormley
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 2 June 2006 http://focus.aps.org/,
Sam Wormley
Geomagnetism geometry question,
Elvis Presley
10.0 mCi of Tc99m Moyoviw,
Atmos
Re: Usenet/Web is the best way to let the poor have a voice.,
Roy L . Fuchs
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 55: The Interval ds in SR, GR, and PI (Probable Influence),
OsherD
Re: Shocked and embarrased - Re: Arbitrariness in mathematical phisics,
David Bernier
Defining a circle,
hetware
Re: Why don't you show a picture/video of the whale engine ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
Pioneering physical chemist and physics Nobel laureate Ray Davis,
Sam Wormley
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 2 Jun 06 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
Earth & reconnect,
Sid
Re: Terminal Velocity of Impacting our Moon,
tadchem
physics explaination please,
hunnma
PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 779 June 2, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein and Davide Castelvecchi,
Sam Wormley
Re: Question about General Relativity,
carlip-nospam
Re: Anomalous "memory" effects,
top9
Hi Mike,
Violet
Causal posting,
Mike
Loop or string theory?,
Violet
Re: Need Help For Physics Project,
DJ FroZone
"The Flaw in High Energy Physics",
Klim
What are the three best popular-science books?,
Sam Wormley
Antinuclear call to arms,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Antinuclear call to arms,
Mike Jr.
- Re: Antinuclear call to arms,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Antinuclear call to arms,
Jan Panteltje
- Re: Antinuclear call to arms,
mmeron
- Re: Antinuclear call to arms,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Antinuclear call to arms,
mmeron
- Re: Antinuclear call to arms,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Antinuclear call to arms,
mmeron
- Re: Antinuclear call to arms,
Math Freak
- Re: Antinuclear call to arms,
Mike Jr.
- Re: Antinuclear call to arms,
Sam Wormley
- Message not available
- Re: Antinuclear call to arms,
Sam Wormley
- Message not available
- Re: Antinuclear call to arms,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Antinuclear call to arms,
Rock Brentwood
Re: Antinuclear call to arms,
Jan Panteltje
Simple Question (Not homework),
abu
summer work,
Julka
Frequency Modulation Continued,
Nate, Nano
Understanding the physics of hurricanes can help scientists,
Sam Wormley
Gravity's dark side,
Sam Wormley
Re: capacitance of a rectangular box,
Edward Green
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 54.2: Linear Model Doesn't Restrict Light Speed,
OsherD
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 54.1: dt = (sum dyi - sum dxi)/n,
OsherD
Hailing Ken Seto - Emergency Request,
Benod The Numerous
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 54: dt = dy - dx,
OsherD
A fresh look at glass,
Sam Wormley
Why is space observed to be geometrically flat?,
zitterbewegung
Mind and Reality in science,
MobyDikc
Re: Please help a newbie...,
Timo A. Nieminen
A question of discrete space-time.,
Ed Hanna
Re: earth's magnetic field,
John Sefton
kinetics of enzymes,
Julka
Re: Action Principle and Newton's Laws,
glhansen@xxxxxxx
Self studying classical mechanics,
tc . technetium
Electromagnetism and the photoelectric effect [hsc problems question] plz help,
nathan
Gas Laws question,
Tim Alfred
"Measuring Our Absolute Velocity",
Klim
Interaction of light with matter,
john . spevacek
Re: How hard can a human suck?,
Timo A. Nieminen
Re: I finally managed to signup with EC21.COM .,
hu how
Re: interaction of two free magentic dipoles,
Bob Cain
What is a positive rotation?,
hetware
Suburbia everywhere, all the time.,
Jeff…Relf
Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 53: Banach vs Hilbert, +/- vs mult/division,
OsherD
Re: THE MECHANLICS OF THE UNIVERSE,
donstockbauer
Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 52: Knowledge, Riccati, Raychaudhuri Equation,
OsherD
Looks of space-time,
Physitrex
Is tj frazir Houdini or Jelf Relf?,
tdp1001
Re: What physical quantity has units of ...?,
tdp1001
Re: MASSLESS PHOTONS BUT VARIABLE SPEED OF LIGHT,
Y.Porat
Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations,
Roy L . Fuchs
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations,
Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations,
Brad Guth
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations,
Brad Guth
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations,
Brad Guth
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations,
Randy Poe
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
hunnma
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Brad Guth
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Randy Poe
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Brad Guth
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Brad Guth
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Randy Poe
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Brad Guth
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Brad Guth
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Brad Guth
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Randy Poe
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax proof,
Brad Guth
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations,
Brad Guth
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations,
Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations,
Brad Guth
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations,
Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations,
Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: Apollo moon landing hoax accusations,
Roy L . Fuchs
Checks.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Checks.,
Randy Poe
- Re: Checks.,
jimp
- Re: Checks.,
tj Frazir
- Go for it Randy... the 10 dollars is waiting for you.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Go for it Randy... the 10 dollars is waiting for you.,
T Wake
- Re: Checks.,
tj Frazir
- Why not make it an even billion ?,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Checks.,
T Wake
- Re: Checks.,
tj Frazir
- Make it 500 million, you only live once.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Checks.,
T Wake
- Message not available
- Re: Checks.,
jimp
- Please give me one example...,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Please give me one example...,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Please give me one example...,
jimp
- What I posted is nowhere near enough to get a state ID.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: What I posted is nowhere near enough to get a state ID.,
T Wake
- Finger printing.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Finger printing.,
PD
- Re: Finger printing.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Finger printing.,
PD
- Re: Finger printing.,
T Wake
- Re: Finger printing.,
T Wake
- Re: Finger printing.,
jimp
- Re: Finger printing.,
T Wake
- UPS... What a company !,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: UPS... What a company !,
T Wake
- Re: UPS... What a company !,
PD
- I'll have to use the U.S. Mail, paying much higher shipping costs.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: I'll have to use the U.S. Mail, paying much higher shipping costs.,
PD
- PD's wild imagination.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: PD's wild imagination.,
T Wake
- Re: I'll have to use the U.S. Mail, paying much higher shipping costs.,
T Wake
- Re: What I posted is nowhere near enough to get a state ID.,
jimp
- Message not available
- NewsWeek sucks.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: NewsWeek sucks.,
T Wake
- Re: Please give me one example...,
PD
- You can't open a Post_Office_Box without a U.S. passport or state ID.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: You can't open a Post_Office_Box without a U.S. passport or state ID.,
PD
- PD... You have _No_ idea what it takes to get a state ID.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: PD... You have _No_ idea what it takes to get a state ID.,
T Wake
- Re: You can't open a Post_Office_Box without a U.S. passport or state ID.,
PD
- Stolen, hacked or otherwise untraceable cell phones are quite common.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Stolen, hacked or otherwise untraceable cell phones are quite common.,
PD
- Re: Stolen, hacked or otherwise untraceable cell phones are quite common.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Stolen, hacked or otherwise untraceable cell phones are quite common.,
PD
- We can shoot some pool or something... _Honestly_, I'm quite boring.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: We can shoot some pool or something... _Honestly_, I'm quite boring.,
PD
- Re: We can shoot some pool or something... _Honestly_, I'm quite boring.,
T Wake
- Re: Stolen, hacked or otherwise untraceable cell phones are quite common.,
Roy L . Fuchs
- Re: Stolen, hacked or otherwise untraceable cell phones are quite common.,
T Wake
- Re: Stolen, hacked or otherwise untraceable cell phones are quite common.,
T Wake
- Re: You can't open a Post_Office_Box without a U.S. passport or state ID.,
Randy Poe
- How I know what is or isn't required to get an ID.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: How I know what is or isn't required to get an ID.,
PD
- Re: How I know what is or isn't required to get an ID.,
Jeff…Relf
- Re: Please give me one example...,
T Wake
- Message not available
- Why I'm so proud of being judgment proof.,
Jeff…Relf
apollo proof of hoax,
hunnma
Re: Aluminum Rocket Questions,
Chumley
Re: bird flu vaccine,
Chumley
Surprisingly, gas and water flows 100 to 10,000 times faster,
Sam Wormley
Extensive dunes, like those seen in the Namib and Sahara deserts,
Sam Wormley
Re: Small CO2 Laser,
Protoman
Re: Need help with Gold dissolved in sea water,
ralph
Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
hetware
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
John C . Polasek
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
hetware
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
hetware
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
Greg Hansen
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
Igor
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
hetware
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
Igor
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
Igor
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
hetware
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
hetware
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
The Sorcerer
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
hetware
- Re: sinh, cosh Lorentz Xformations: illumination or obfuscation?,
Ken S. Tucker
T.J., Say hi to Knut for me.,
Jeff…Relf
Re: Static charge and ionisation of air?,
jimp
Re: Is it safe to post my account number ?,
tj Frazir
Re: Yes !,
tj Frazir
