Mechanical Light

(Mechanical) Light and Universal Redshift

The well established scientific knowledge of sound should be used to
understand the science of light since light has all the characteristic
properties of the particle wave of sound. Unfortunately, our scientific
community has instead accepted light theories contradicting the science
of sound. The misunderstanding of light has led to the development of
theory of relativity and the entire modern physics. Upon discovering
the atmospheric neutrinos to be the common scientific origin of
universal phenomena, it is time for the correct science of light. Light
is the "particle wave" of neutrinos just like that sound is the
particle wave of air. Therefore, light should not be object-free
transversal wave. It is the mechanical wave of neutrinos and, like
sound, should be longitudinal too. Like sound, light travels at
constant velocity in the atmospheric neutrinos having constant
concentration and energy only. Also, like sound, light velocity is
affected by both relative motions and energy and/or concentration
variations of its medium (the atmospheric neutrinos) and shown as
Doppler effects.

The atmospheric neutrinos are the only constantly replenished objects
taking up the entire space of the universe capable of producing light
anywhere in the universe. Besides, only the unique physical properties
of neutrinos fit those of light. For example, scientists have found
that neutrinos travel at the speed of light. Scientists have already
shown that energies such as heat energy cause orbital electrons in
atoms and molecules rapidly oscillating among quantized orbital to
produce light. As a charged particle, electron is uniquely small but
having a strong charge-energy. Among charged particles, electrons
therefore have particularly dense atmosphere of neutrinos of their own,
which allow them to effectively interact and exchange neutrinos with
the atmosphere of neutrinos of the universe to produce "particle wave
of neutrinos" or light. This may be the reason why only electron
produces light.

Both "aether" and "light speed" are very controversial and
emotional issues since the entire "scientific foundation" of modern
physics is based on the postulations that light travels at an absolute
constant speed and does not need aether to transmit! The scientific
knowledge of physics of mechanics however has ruled out the possibility
that anything can travel at an absolute constant speed or not to have
relative motions! Light speed has been found to be constant but light
also exhibits all kinds of Doppler effects of the sound. The science of
sound teaches that its Doppler effects are either due to having
relative motions or medium effect or both. If light has the same kind
science of sound, on a constantly moving object such as Earth light
should travel at different velocity in different directions. These
light velocity differences may be too small to be detectable
experimentally since the famous Michelson-Morley experiments had failed
to find any difference in light speed from different directions.
However, physicists still need to prove that the detection (light
interference) method used by this experiment is scientifically sound
and valid and is capable of sensitively detect very small difference in
light speed even today. Correct answer to these questions relies on
having correct scientific knowledge of light and "light interference
patterns" and findings to prove the validity of the detection method.


(Relative) light velocity changes should be detectable by measuring
frequency changes such as red or blue shift of light spectra. Inside
Earth atmospheric neutrinos continue to interact with subatomic
particles to lose energy to produce gravity, to maintain the charge
energies of protons and electrons and atomic and molecular structure,
to produce heat, etc. Upon approaching Earth, the energy of the
atmospheric neutrinos therefore continues to reduce to reach a minimum
at the center of the Earth so should be the speed of light. It means
that light speed in outer space should be faster (having higher
frequency) than those on the ground and underground of the Earth. Since
light-speed change should be detectable by frequency change, a spectrum
taken on ground or in an underground laboratory should have a redshift
in comparison with that taken in a space station. Unlike the
"directional gravitational redshift" predicted by Einstein, this
redshift is not affected by direction, only by location. This
prediction should be easily provable e.g., by NASA scientists.
Actually, it has been proven already by the findings that the global
positioning system (GPS) needs frequency modification all the time to
work properly. Einstein's spacetime and distorted spacetime happen to
mimic and calculate surprisingly well some of the energy variation
effects of the atmospheric neutrinos but have completely wrong science!

Bounded by their own no-aether postulation, Einstein and scientists
have failed to correctly predict and explain the universal redshift
phenomenon leading to an entirely wrong modern cosmology! Their
"inescapable" conclusion of the universal redshift phenomenon is
that the universe was born from a big bang of a "singularity" and
has been constantly expanding ever since. Upon finding the atmosphere
of neutrinos to be aether, the findings of the universal redshift also
support the scientific possibility due to having transmission medium or
aether effect. The scientific choice between the two scientific
possibilities, a constant expanding universe or an effect of the
transmission medium of light, should be entirely based on additional
observational and experimental findings.

Telescopic observation results accumulated over the past several
centuries are the most reliable and conclusive findings of astronomers.
They have concluded that stars are not evenly distributed in the
universe. Stars are in galaxies only and all galaxies are separated by
very large starless spaces. Since neutrinos are produced by stars, the
energy and the concentration of the atmospheric neutrinos should also
be unevenly distributed. Their energy and concentration are at maximum
levels inside galaxies and are at minimum levels at the centers of the
starless intergalactic spaces. A star or galaxy light passing through a
starless intergalactic space should lose some energy and have a
redshift and this redshift effect should be additive. Therefore, the
universal redshift of star lights is due to their passing through
starless intergalactic spaces on their way to us. The Hubble Law
therefore supports the telescopic findings that galaxies are about
evenly distributed among starless intergalactic spaces. Meanwhile,
there is no additional finding to support the conclusion of the Big
Bang Theory that the universe is uniformly expanding.

Light therefore does not even travel at constant velocity in space! It
travels significantly slower in the starless intergalactic spaces than
inside galaxies. The starless intergalactic spaces should also have
(star) light dimming effect proportional to that of redshift. Upon
ignoring the star-light dimming effect, the star-light comparison
method used by astronomers to measure the distances of stars and
galaxies and the visible size of the universe should have a
systematical error. The Hubble-Law relationship should be utilized to
correct this systematical error.

The Missions of my Posts

I would like to prove to the public that it is a mechanical world that
is logical and makes common sense by posting the follows topics one at
a time: real science, gravity, other universal forces, light and
universal red-shift, Microwave background, universe, stars, planetary
motions, particle physics, etc. Public understanding, debates and
actions are needed for the further development of the physics of
mechanics-based new aether science now in its infancy stage and to save
our science.

Physics of mechanics has been repeatedly proven to be the only real
(correct) science without unproved postulation in the past four
centuries. It has long predicted the presence of something (aether)
having masses and relative motions taking up all space in the universe
to produce universal phenomena. Recently, I have discovered that the
atmosphere of neutrinos is both the aether scientists have been looking
for centuries and the common scientific origin of all universal
phenomena. My discovery has expanded physics of mechanics to the
science of everything and again disproved all no-aether theories
including modern physics, which should be wrong to begin with since
they are based on postulations contradicting the teachings of physics
of mechanics. Like the ancient geocentric cosmology, both modern
physics and its modern cosmology are now proven to be a pseudo-science
based on unscientific postulations (those contradict the teachings of
physics of mechanics) and mathematic models.

It is time for physicists, cosmologists, astronomers, their scientific
communities, particularly the scientific research and education
agencies of our government such as NSF and NASA, which we all trust so
much, to bravely face the contradictions between physics of mechanics
and all the no-aether theories they have developed and accepted over
the past three centuries including modern physics and come back to real
science. Lets all welcome a scientific "quantum leap" from
religious beliefs and mathematic fantasies, to a simple consistent
coherent scientific understanding of the universe and universal
phenomena.

To save the credibility of the entire physics as a real science (and
the fundamental science of all fields of science), it is time for all
physicists to break their silence letting those pseudo-physicists to
continue to destroy real science. Please discuss my posts in meetings,
classrooms, and journals and boldly speak out to correct the
centuries-long scientific mistakes in physics and cosmology.

JoeT

.

Relevant Pages