Re: I don't expect anyone to understand what I write unless...

In article <1151949719.559658.36460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, PD
<TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jeff...Relf wrote:
I don't expect anyone to understand what I write unless:

1. They've recently studied what I have.

2. They happen to be here.

3. We both have the time and desire to converse about it.

These three things rarely come together, believe me.
( I should be coding right now, instead of goofing off here )

Jeff's Law of Depth, derived:
1. Some code that is important in practice is difficult to decipher by
looking at the code.
2. If code is difficult to decipher by looking at it, then it is
important in practice.
3. If a physical theory is difficult to decipher by looking at it, then
it is important in practice.
4. No one understands Jeff_Relf's physical theory, by proclamation,
therefore it is important in practice.

PD


Great Scott, I think you are right ;-)

--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull*** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my *** poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006
"I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006
PWNED

"Puddle*** tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot
calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006
PWNED
.

Quantcast