Re: Calculating Newtons in Joules and Joules/s



Randy Poe wrote:
Dennis B wrote:
Yes. I agree, since we seem to have very different concepts of reality.
Not that I haven't made some errors along the way. Yet, I admit my
errors.

You alternate statements like this with grandiose statements
about how you're going to redo all of physics, like what
follows immediately below.

The only reason I am attempting to decipher force, work, and
power is to determine whether work and force are both energy.

They aren't.

Everyone
tells me that work is not force and that there is a difference between
momentum, energy and force.

That is correct.

Yet, it seems to me that work is obviously force.

And what is "obvious" or what "seems to you" is something
which is patently false. Just because you want it to be true or
believe it is not going to suddenly change the way the universe
works.

And force is obviously energy.

Again, what is "obvious" to you is blatantly wrong.

The separation of momentum,
energy, work, and force only causes confusion (presuming I am correct).

In other words, you are confused about the meanings of these
four different words. You are projecting when you say that
"their separating causes confusion". YOU are confused. YOU
are struggling with these separate concepts, getting them
muddled together in YOUR mind.

To truly understand them, one must understand how they are related.

We know how they are related.

Force is the time derivative of momentum.

Work is the integral of F.dx

Work is a form of energy.

I
believe the equation I have formulated (W = F/d * nd) will make physics
much easier to learn (for me as well as everyone).

Again, something you "believe" is patent nonsense. This "equation"
is gobbledegook. The symbols are not being used in meaningful
ways.

- Randy

You are blind if you cannot see that force is energy. Force can be
measured in J/m. The distinctions between momentum, energy, work, and
force are that they are different measurements of one thing: Energy.
For everything is energy. You cannot argue with that. A force is that
which causes a change of momentum. Thus, force can be a mass in motion
(F = ma). A mass in motion is also a manifestation of energy. It has
momentum, or kinetic energy, and can transfer momentum, in other words
exert force, and do work. The force it exerts and the momentum
transferred is related to the kinetic energy (1/2mv^2) of it's motion.
It's all ultimatey energy in motion. You can call it whatever you want,
but the words and distinctions assigned do not change the reality.

-Dennis B

.

Relevant Pages

  • Unified Field: Relative Momentum
    ... The Photoelectric Effect and the Momentum of a Photon ... field of Quantum Physics in the 20th Century. ... of energy. ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Unified Field: Relative Momentum
    ... The Photoelectric Effect and the Momentum of a Photon ... field of Quantum Physics in the 20th Century. ... of energy. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Unified Field: Relative Momentum
    ... The Photoelectric Effect and the Momentum of a Photon ... field of Quantum Physics in the 20th Century. ... of energy. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: .Re: Why all the fascination with E = mc^2 ??
    ... >> Conservation of Momentum, which, in Newtonian mechanics, is a direct ... >> consequence of Newton's Third Law of Motion. ... >> and the kinetic energy of a body is given by ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: A little Knowledge
    ... >> Coincidently today I was talking to a PhD student ... > But momentum *is* like energy. ... What is a 'temporal' 'constant of motion'? ...
    (sci.physics)
Quantcast