Re: Mechanical Light


JoeT wrote:
Welcome back PD. Sorry, I shall not continue to argue on light
polarization and interference pattern since they are the source of
confusion and misleading scientific community. The strong scientific
evidences that light is the particle wave of sound is given below:

1. There is nothing else taking up all space in the universe
continuously replenished by stars except neutrinos.

That simply isn't true. Photons also take up all space in the universe
and are continuously replenished by stars. Moreover, there is a whole
bunch of dark matter which we don't know a lot about except we know for
sure that it ain't neutrinos or photons.

Therefore, only
neutrinos can produce all universal phenomena anywhere in the universe.
They even produce micro-universal phenomena too, e.g., producing
elemental charged particles, atoms, and molecules. 2. Only neutrinos
have been found to travel at light speed.

Actually, that's wrong on two counts. Photons travel at light speed.
Neutrinos do NOT travel at light speed. You are reading an old guess
that turns out to be wrong.

3. Only neutrinos have the
unique properties to produce other universe phenomena such as universal
forces including gravity.

Neutrinos interact TOO STRONGLY to account for gravity. The weak force
that neutrinos exhibit is numerically orders of magnitude stronger than
the gravitational force.

4. The universal redshift and the Hubble Law
support that the atmosphere of neutrinos is the aether produces and
transmits light, which have the support of all the telescopic
observations. It offers a scientific explanation to the cosmic
microwave background phenomenon too.

Actually, you haven't demonstrated that at all. And before you start to
think you have, note that existing theories already account for the
cosmic microwave background *numerically*, and that big bang theory
accounts for the anisotropies in that background *numerically*, as well
as the ratio of helium to hydrogen in the universe *numerically*. That
is, existing theories not only explain how things things arise, but
also how *much* should be seen. It is essential for you to understand
that for your model to compete, it MUST demonstrate that it can not
only explain how but also tell you *how much* (that is, provide a
*number* that can be checked against a measurement). I cannot
overemphasize that. NO AMOUNT of pleading that the explanation
involving neutrinos is more natural, more understandable, more
consistent with common sense, more far-reaching, will compensate for
lacking the ability to calculate anything with that explanation. If you
can't calculate with it and come up with a number that can be compared
to experiment, the "theory" is USELESS. You may feel that is unfair. It
is true nonetheless.


Recognizing neutrinos to be the common scientific origin of universal
phenomena brings an overall scientific understanding of the universal
phenomena and the universe (to be posted soon). With its scope even
broader then all no-aether theories combined and its consistency with
physics of mechanics. It is time for the physics, cosmology, and
astronomy scientific communities to take the new aether science given
in my posts seriously and to come back to real science.

JoeT

Jim Black wrote:
JoeT wrote:
Jim Black wrote:
JoeT wrote:
In my opinion, polarization is not will understood science like light
interference pattern and there is no scientific reason for "gas" to
have transverse wave. Before we really scientifically understand
polarization, we should not conclude that light has transverse (and
massless) wave.

Huh? Both polarization and interference make perfect sense if light is
a transverse wave. If there's something you don't understand about the
theory, ask about it instead of assuming that no one understands.

You are so sure that light is electromagnetic wave or photon?

No. As I said, the current model might just be a good approximation to
a more accurate model.

Then
explain what is electromagnetic wave or photon in non-mathematical
terms.

An electromagnetic wave is a force that makes charged particles move
back and forth. If you want to know what the numerical value of that
force is, you want mathematics. Note that what I just described is the
classical model of light, which is now known to be an approximation to
the more accurate quantum model. For an explanation of quantum
electrodynamics with as little mathematics as possible, try:

http://www.vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8

While transverse waves work very well for predicting what light will
do, there remains the possibility that they are merely a useful
approximation to a more accurate model of light. However, the idea
that light is a longitudinal wave must be thrown out, because, as I
explained previously, a longitudinal wave is unchanged by rotations
about its direction of travel, but light is.

Now, there is a lot of scientific evidences to prove that light is the
particle wave of neutrinos.

Have you experimented with polarizers, and tried to explain the results
with your model yet? If not, it looks like you're ignoring the
experiments that don't agree with your theory, which isn't very
scientific at all.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Mechanical Light
    ... There is nothing else taking up all space in the universe ... continuously replenished by stars except neutrinos. ... have transverse wave. ... You are so sure that light is electromagnetic wave or photon? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Mechanical Light
    ... neutrinos can produce all universal phenomena anywhere in the universe. ... have transverse wave. ... polarization, we should not conclude that light has transverse (and ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Mechanical Light
    ... There is nothing else taking up all space in the universe ... continuously replenished by stars except neutrinos. ... neutrinos can produce all universal phenomena anywhere in the universe. ... have transverse wave. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: G/t=u
    ... what is the collapse of the wave ... but we see an ordered state become a disordered ... You would assume that entropy was working in reverse. ... Now when the universe expands however, that causes true entropy, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Seeking open-minded physicist
    ... It is the free frame of a wave interaction. ... which wants to expand along with the universe ... causes the force of gravity. ...
    (sci.physics)