Re: Charge is not a property of particles.
- From: "Igor" <thoovler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Jul 2006 10:21:22 -0700
malibu wrote:
All particles have charge.
All particles are charge in motion; moving
charge; standing waves of charge.
Charge is not a property of particles.
Without the charge, there is no particle.
It is particles that are a property of charge.
Everything is charge.
Everything is a separation of positive from negative
and an investment of energy into maintaining that
separation.
This separation can be into 'particles', which
are 3D, therefore relatively stationary, or
radiation, which is 2D plus C.
This isn't true even for fundamental particles. What about neutrinos?
Where's their charge? Your post is just silly.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Charge is not a property of particles.
- From: Rock Brentwood
- Re: Charge is not a property of particles.
- References:
- Charge is not a property of particles.
- From: malibu
- Charge is not a property of particles.
- Prev by Date: Re: force vs power
- Next by Date: Curriculum for easy physics course?
- Previous by thread: Re: Charge is not a property of particles.
- Next by thread: Re: Charge is not a property of particles.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|