Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: Ben Newsam <ben.newsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:14:02 +0100
On 14 Jul 2006 07:51:32 -0700, "Brad Guth" <ieisbradguth@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
The unfiltered Kodak moments should
have unavoidably recorded the very least of Spica and Sirius as plain
as day, and where exactly were each of those stars in relationship to
the physically dark lunar horizon?
How do you know that? Have you been there?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: jimp
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- Prev by Date: Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- Next by Date: Easier solution to wiles´ one to the fermat congruence
- Previous by thread: Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- Next by thread: Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification
- Index(es):