Re: Nonrenormalization vs Renormalization 83.8: Operator-Exponent-Raising Yields Acceleration

From Osher Doctorow mdoctorow@xxxxxxxxxxx

If this analysis is correct, then mass arguably in its very nature has
a "collapsing" tendency which is gravitation. Certainly we regard
weight of people on earth, for example, as something of a "collapsing"
tendency. But physicists have tended to assume that masses away from
planets or larger objects lack a collapsing tendency because everything
seems to be in "free fall".

Then what is Dark Energy? Again, if this analysis is correct, then
Dark Energy is arguably energy involved in expansion and objects'
tendencies to expand. If masses and not just space have a tendency to
expand, or if the expansion of space is in fact a consequence of
masses' tendency to expand, then the problem of Dark Energy is solved.


Why would objects have a tendency to expand? We actually don't have
to go far beyond gravitation to "see" why. If the tendency to
contract sucks other objects in, as with black holes, then objects are
being subjected to pulls away from their centers by external objects'
tendencies to contract. The "sucking in" is simply much less easily
observed for objects other than planetary or stellar size or larger.
Of course, there can be many additional expansion tendency scenarios
including "pulling forces from infinity", Chaplygin gas, etc.

Osher Doctorow

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: black holes create dark energy
    ... > (alistair) wrote: ... >>If black holes create dark energy, then the tendency for dark energy ... >>to cause expansion of space in the black hole would be balanced by the ... >>tendency of gravity to pull the mass of the black hole to one point.So ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • black holes create dark energy
    ... If black holes create dark energy, then the tendency for dark energy ... to cause expansion of space in the black hole would be balanced by the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)