Re: Intelligent designer


"Mike" <eleatis@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1153166576.011871.102680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

uri wrote:
The theory of intelligent design (ID) holds that certain features of
the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent
cause rather than an undirected process such as natural selection.

Obviously. The probablity thatn man was created by evolutionary process
was calculated to be equal to the probability of getting a 747
instntenuously assempled by laying down its parts on a flat surface and
then waiting for a strong wind to blow in such a way as to put
everything together with the great accuracy required to do the fine job
of assemby.


ID
is thus a scientific disagreement with the core claim of evolutionary
theory that the apparent design of living systems is an illusion.

There is no such claim. Theory of evolution lacks the foundations that
characterize a theory. It is just a collection of scattered empirical
knowledge subject to the induction problem. On the other hand, ID does
not allow any predictions or falsifications.

Both are maybe completely wrong, evolution and ID, and they represent a
trap for human knowledge and society. The whole debate is a trap.
Divide and conquer that is. Half of the people, the pilgims, donate to
religions and the other half, the progressive, pay the taxes for stupid
research.

It is just like the abortion/prolife debate. Some make money out of it.
The answer is we do not know how species evolve or whether they were
created. There is no concrete evidence to provide support for either
alternative.

Ever caught a cold or a flu, imbecile?
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/FailingDeclare.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndroclesTeach.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Sociology.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/BrainHoles.html

Dirk Vdm


Do not waste your time getting immerse in such directed debates.

Mike


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Intelligent designer
    ... cause rather than an undirected process such as natural selection. ... The probablity thatn man was created by evolutionary process ... theory that the apparent design of living systems is an illusion. ... Both are maybe completely wrong, evolution and ID, and they represent a ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Intelligent designer
    ... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: ... cause rather than an undirected process such as natural selection. ... theory that the apparent design of living systems is an illusion. ... Both are maybe completely wrong, evolution and ID, and they represent a ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Intelligent designer
    ... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: ... cause rather than an undirected process such as natural selection. ... theory that the apparent design of living systems is an illusion. ... Both are maybe completely wrong, evolution and ID, and they represent a ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: How do the complex structures of the most ancient creatures demolish the theory of evolution ?
    ... > How do the complex structures of the most ancient creatures demolish ... > Living things form a chain in the fossil record. ... Proponents of the theory of evolution describe this ... > fossil beds are examined is in some way proof of this. ...
    (sci.skeptic)
  • How do the complex structures of the most ancient creatures demolish the theory of evolution ?
    ... How do the complex structures of the most ancient creatures demolish ... Living things form a chain in the fossil record. ... Proponents of the theory of evolution describe this ...
    (sci.skeptic)