Re: Electricity again




"tadchem" <thomas.davidson@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1155112403.145084.232090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > "tadchem" <thomas.davidson@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:1155076760.226545.83170@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > |
| > | Teja wrote:
| > | > tadchem wrote:
| > | >
| > | > >
| > | > > You should then be able to answer your own question.
| > | > Well i'm still 13 yrs old and u cant expect me to make all that
| > | > calculations pretty fast
| > |
| > | Let me hand you the answer, then. We simply do not yet have the
| > | technology to instantly put a lightning bolt into a can.
| > |
| > | Tom Davidson
| > | Richmond, VA
| >
| > You lose. We've had lightning rods and Faraday cages for years.
| > Storing it in the can is the hard part, putting it there is easy.
|
| I never considered that getting the lightning bolt *to* the can would
| be a problem.
| It's all "location, location, location":
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Lightning_striking_the_Eiffel_Tower_-_NOAA.jpg

That's a pretty good Faraday cage, I see the lights are still on.


|
| Franklin (the guy who invented the lightning rod) was able to put _a
| little_ electricity from a lightning bolt into a can. If he had caught
| a full lightning bolt, he probably would not be on our money. He
| certainly could not have *canned* the whole lightning bolt.

| We *still* cannot put that much power into a storage unit that fast.

It's all "amount, amount, amount". We have the technology to charge
a capacitor. Whilst I agree that it would be pointless, dangerous and
prohibitively expensive to capture Super Dooper Ultra High Voltage
for very little current, we regularly use much lower voltages at higher
current.
Power is measured in watt hours, submarine batteries of voltaic cells
would hold the same POWER as a lightning bolt.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_(physics)

There is a difference between "having" the technology and constructing the
equipment.
We *still* cannot put that much power into a storage unit that fast, but we
*could* if we wanted to.

Androcles.


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Electricity again
    ... |> It's all "amount, amount, amount". ... That is *energy*. ... Power is in watts. ... The power of a lightning bolt ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Electricity again
    ... |> It's all "amount, amount, amount". ... That is *energy*. ... Power is in watts. ... The power of a lightning bolt ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Electricity again
    ... |> It's all "amount, amount, amount". ... That is *energy*. ... Power is in watts. ... The power of a lightning bolt ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Why we cant make a lot of energy from ligthening?
    ... >> than 4 times the temperature of the surface of the sun. ... >cover 500 square miles with something to collect that energy. ... While there is a lot of *power* in a lightning bolt, ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: Looking for 6 inch subwoofer
    ... The original 901 required a huge amount of power and it was new technology ... it could blow a match out about five feet in front ...
    (rec.audio.car)

Loading