Re: Fourier transform obsolete?
- From: "Zod, General" <spamless@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 21:17:52 -0500
<mrdarrett@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1155148622.162640.80030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I vaguely remember the Gibbs phenomenon when studying partial
differential equations many years ago, and while they disturbed me a
bit at the time, I ignored the "ringing" in order to concentrate on
studying for my exams.
Today, with wavelet transforms which don't seem to suffer from the
Gibbs phenomenon, is the Fourier transform obsolete...?!
The JPEG2000 standard uses wavelets, but I hear different stories about
which produces better pictures (the dog-bowl images on wikipedia
actually show a slightly blurrier image for the wavelet-encoded image):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jpeg2000
Michael
checkout 3 dimensional F transforms too.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fourier transform obsolete?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Fourier transform obsolete?
- References:
- Fourier transform obsolete?
- From: mrdarrett
- Fourier transform obsolete?
- Prev by Date: Re: Electricity again
- Next by Date: Re: NEWTON WAS WRONG
- Previous by thread: Re: Fourier transform obsolete?
- Next by thread: Re: Fourier transform obsolete?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|