Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 5.0: How To Use the Riccati Equation Oppositely to Gravitation
- From: vanep@xxxxxxx
- Date: 13 Aug 2006 15:39:53 -0700
OsherD wrote:
From Osher Doctorow mdoctorow@xxxxxxxxxxx
Zod of spaml...invalid.com gets credit for an interesting but
inapplicable observation. Readers who have read my earlier threads
probably realize that I often ignore dimensional constants for
simplicity as I do in this case. If that seems too easy, then so was
Einstein's index summation convention. Simplicity is the password,
although not "too simple".
Osher
Write it so it's dimensionally correct. Nobody cares what you generally
do.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 5.0: How To Use the Riccati Equation Oppositely to Gravitation
- From: OsherD
- Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 5.0: How To Use the Riccati Equation Oppositely to Gravitation
- From: Zod, General
- Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 5.0: How To Use the Riccati Equation Oppositely to Gravitation
- From: OsherD
- Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 5.0: How To Use the Riccati Equation Oppositely to Gravitation
- Prev by Date: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 6.0: Riccati 2 Version Using Special Relativity Beta Squared
- Next by Date: Re: Moon, still looks as far as it was 37 yrs ago
- Previous by thread: Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 5.0: How To Use the Riccati Equation Oppositely to Gravitation
- Next by thread: Re: Quantum Gravity Via Expansion-Contraction 5.0: How To Use the Riccati Equation Oppositely to Gravitation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
