Re: Are physicists arrogant ?
- From: Greg Hansen <glhansen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 08:46:12 -0500
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Stan wrote:
I am new to these groups so I may be a bit naive. But I have subscribed
to both sci.math and sci.physics and almost immediately noticed a
substantial difference which kept me so far at an arm-length distance
from this group:
While the mathematicians generally maintain good manners, the physicist
surprisingly often label each other as 'naive, 'stupid', or even
'idiots'. The question is "why and who is responsible?"
Physicists still can't accept the simple fact that their idiot
modern physics, rest mass, is inconsistent with observed evidence.
So they spend all their time with astrologers, looking
for news words to describe their diocy,
like internal consistncy, indecodeable,
unregisterability, un-non-Truth-afiability.
Any other questions, Stan?
.
- References:
- Re: Are physicists arrogant ?
- From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Are physicists arrogant ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Decagon Shaped Droplet
- Next by Date: Re: Classical physics problem - for fun
- Previous by thread: Re: Are physicists arrogant ?
- Next by thread: settle a bet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|