Re: Carnot cycle and gasoline octane
- From: "cnctut" <cnctutwiler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Aug 2006 22:14:02 -0700
David Lemper wrote:
It is said that ://
1. a high compression internal combustion engine is more efficit as
it goes out further on the Carnot cycle.
2. High octane gas ( eg 91 ) has less energy density than 87 octane.
Questions :
1. Will a high compression engine get more miles per gallon than a
lower compression engine in the same vehicle ?
2. Considering the increased cost of 91 octane, does a high
compression engine produce a saving or added cost to the
economy ? Is there any data ?
David Lemper
Dave,
The compression ratio of a motor has an impact on the thermal
efficiency of the air/fuel burn and is approx equal to:
e=1-1/r^.3 where e=thermal efficiency and r=compression ratio
Therefore, increasing the compression ration (CR) has the potential to
make the engine more efficient for the same amount of fuel--which would
mean more miles per gallon. Of course, its not quite that simple.
Other engine factors that weigh-in include detonation/pre-ignition
points, ignition timing and air fuel ratios. All have to be balanced
for best performance.
Octane aids in diminishing the air/fuel mixture from igniting
spontaniously before the proper time in the compression cycle. Higher
fuel octane numbers allow higher CR's (and higher thermal efficiencies)
before this occures. Alcohol fuels have higher octane ratings generally
than gasoline (99 for ethanol/106 for methanol) and even though they
have less heating value, the higher equivalent octane ratings provide
thermal incentives in high CR racing engines.
So to answer your first question--yes, with conditions.
Second question--
Ethanol is used as an octane booster for cheaper gas. Today, regular 87
octane gas has generally about 10% ethanol in it for this purpose.
Ethanol is cheaper than gasoline--(regardless of what you've heard),
therefore to answer your 91octane question would really depend on the
composition of the 91octane fuel and other factors to numerous to
mention. In general terms, if a 12:1 CR gave 100% relative power, then
8:1 would yield about 88%, or 12% less power for the same fuel usage. I
leave it to you to play with the numbers to answer your second
question.
Hope this helps,
Tut
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Carnot cycle and gasoline octane
- From: tj Frazir
- Re: Carnot cycle and gasoline octane
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Carnot cycle and gasoline octane
- References:
- Carnot cycle and gasoline octane
- From: David Lemper
- Carnot cycle and gasoline octane
- Prev by Date: Re: Really BIG nuke
- Next by Date: Everyone is invited to contribute to the Sci Physics Open Manuscript Project
- Previous by thread: Carnot cycle and gasoline octane
- Next by thread: Re: Carnot cycle and gasoline octane
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|