Re: Carnot cycle and gasoline octane
- From: Boris Mohar <borism_-void-_@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:09:25 -0400
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 04:12:02 GMT, David Lemper <pdlemper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
It is said that :
1. a high compression internal combustion engine is more efficit as
it goes out further on the Carnot cycle.
2. High octane gas ( eg 91 ) has less energy density than 87 octane.
Questions :
1. Will a high compression engine get more miles per gallon than a
lower compression engine in the same vehicle ?
2. Considering the increased cost of 91 octane, does a high
compression engine produce a saving or added cost to the
economy ? Is there any data ?
David Lemper
Not quite the answer but make your head spin.
http://www.team-integra.net/sections/articles/showArticle.asp?ArticleID=233
Regards,
Boris Mohar
Got Knock? - see:
Viatrack Printed Circuit Designs (among other things) http://www.viatrack.ca
void _-void-_ in the obvious place
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Carnot cycle and gasoline octane
- From: tj Frazir
- Re: Carnot cycle and gasoline octane
- References:
- Carnot cycle and gasoline octane
- From: David Lemper
- Carnot cycle and gasoline octane
- Prev by Date: Re: Decagon Shaped Droplet
- Next by Date: Re: Trying to find some space for research paper.
- Previous by thread: Re: Carnot cycle and gasoline octane
- Next by thread: Re: Carnot cycle and gasoline octane
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|