Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: "cnctut" <cnctutwiler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Aug 2006 18:17:54 -0700
Androcles:
I did scan two translations of his papers--and did find something
similiar to your equation 2AB/(t'A-tA). Perhaps the translation
equation and yours are the same--there appeared to be some difference
though.
I didn't see the f ' (x) equation that you show on the website you
gave--but it may be in the 1905 papers also. To me, the f ' (x)
equation on your website doesn't seem to fit what I would expect a
derivative of f(x) to be by general definition.
Best Wishes,
Tut
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- References:
- Are physics cranks employed?
- From: PD
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: PD
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: PD
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: PD
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: cnctut
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: cnctut
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: cnctut
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: cnctut
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Are physics cranks employed?
- Prev by Date: Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- Next by Date: Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- Next by thread: Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|