Re: Are physics cranks employed?


"hanson" <hanson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d6pGg.21323$uV.8221@xxxxxxxxxxx
| ahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahahaha.... GREAT!
| >
| "PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:1156188294.184566.244320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| [Sorcerer wrote]
| (edited for clarify,... well, for fun!):
| >> When adults play chess the game ends in... honourable resignation.
| >> When children play the game ends in throwing the game pieces in
| >> the air. The name "Phuckwit Duck" originates with this statement:
| >>
| [PD Paul Draper]
| (edited for clarify,... well, for fun too!):
| >> I have to admit that I am demoralized at the moment.
| >> [because] this is clearly the improper forum for that, [as] none
| >> of the "students" will read or attempt to learn from [me, Paul].
| >> [interject: AHAHAHAHA... holy, holy, holy.. ahaha]
| >> I had high hopes -- really -- "I was confused, I get it now.
| >> My head knew better, my heart does not." -- PD
| >>
| [Sorcerer ...]
| >> [....sitting in the duck blind, waiting with a shotgun for a
| >> duck to appear, while citingTom Roberts]
| >> == This is PHYSICS, not math or logic, "proof " is completely
| >> irrelevant - Tom Roberts, FAQ contributor. ==
| >> Apparently physics doesn't require math or logic.
| >>
| [Phuckwit Duck:]
| >> Androcles, in your case, I will get over my disenchantment.
| >> & when we get to a point of conflict, the party in error
| >> MUST acknowledge the error
| >>
| [Sorcerer]:
| >> My terms:
| >> Failing to respond in a reasonable time is unsatisfactory.
| >> The penalty for failing to respond is to be hounded by me
| >> at any time I choose... [and hence] I've been blasting away
| >> at Phuckwit Duck's tail feathers ever since. He always
| >> loses because he's tossing the game pieces in the air.
| >> Amusingly, he now claims I'm amoral, [defining me as]
| >> "lying outside the sphere to which moral judgments apply"
| >> I am indeed amoral, whereas Duck is both immoral & unethical,
| >> & very childish too.. [hence] I have to slap his wrist when he pouts.
| >> I'm amoral only shows how correct my thinking has been all along.
| >> It will never occur to the Duck that there is something wrong with
| >> his thinking. That would be unthinkable.
| >>
| [Phuckwit Duck:]
| > I see you have attempted to win by thinking that no one is
| > watching you. Cheating is a behavior commonly exhibited by the
| > amoral child which is defined as
| > "amoral: Lacking moral sensibility; not caring about right & wrong"
| > (Now I, Paul, see I made a typo in spelling "EXACTLY" as "EXACTLTY"
| > for > which I humbly apologize, and I will attempt to refrain from
| > spelling
| > it that way again.) ..[interject: AHAHAHAHA... holy, holy, holy.. ahaha]
| > You, John Parker, the Sorcverer, have effectively tossed the game
| > pieces in the air in conjunction with cheating [which] is not only
| > evidence of amorality but stupidity.
| > PD
| >
| [hanson]
| ahahaha... More!... More!... More of this!. *** physics!
| You guys' stuff is much, much better.... ahahahaha.....
| Thanks for the laughs!
| ahahaha... ahahanson
|
Ah well, you see, we need physics because Phuckwit Duck
does know just enough to be dangerous, but when it comes
to mathematics he is way out of his depth and that is where
the fun begins.
Moreover, he doesn't know he is out of his depth.
Androcles


.

Quantcast