Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: "hanson" <hanson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:56:41 GMT
ahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahahaha.... GREAT!
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1156188294.184566.244320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[Sorcerer wrote]
(edited for clarify,... well, for fun!):
[PD Paul Draper]When adults play chess the game ends in... honourable resignation.
When children play the game ends in throwing the game pieces in
the air. The name "Phuckwit Duck" originates with this statement:
(edited for clarify,... well, for fun too!):
[Sorcerer ...]I have to admit that I am demoralized at the moment.
[because] this is clearly the improper forum for that, [as] none
of the "students" will read or attempt to learn from [me, Paul].
[interject: AHAHAHAHA... holy, holy, holy.. ahaha]
I had high hopes -- really -- "I was confused, I get it now.
My head knew better, my heart does not." -- PD
[Phuckwit Duck:][....sitting in the duck blind, waiting with a shotgun for a
duck to appear, while citingTom Roberts]
== This is PHYSICS, not math or logic, "proof " is completely
irrelevant - Tom Roberts, FAQ contributor. ==
Apparently physics doesn't require math or logic.
[Sorcerer]:Androcles, in your case, I will get over my disenchantment.
& when we get to a point of conflict, the party in error
MUST acknowledge the error
[Phuckwit Duck:]My terms:
Failing to respond in a reasonable time is unsatisfactory.
The penalty for failing to respond is to be hounded by me
at any time I choose... [and hence] I've been blasting away
at Phuckwit Duck's tail feathers ever since. He always
loses because he's tossing the game pieces in the air.
Amusingly, he now claims I'm amoral, [defining me as]
"lying outside the sphere to which moral judgments apply"
I am indeed amoral, whereas Duck is both immoral & unethical,
& very childish too.. [hence] I have to slap his wrist when he pouts.
I'm amoral only shows how correct my thinking has been all along.
It will never occur to the Duck that there is something wrong with
his thinking. That would be unthinkable.
I see you have attempted to win by thinking that no one is[hanson]
watching you. Cheating is a behavior commonly exhibited by the
amoral child which is defined as
"amoral: Lacking moral sensibility; not caring about right & wrong"
(Now I, Paul, see I made a typo in spelling "EXACTLY" as "EXACTLTY"
for > which I humbly apologize, and I will attempt to refrain from
spelling
it that way again.) ..[interject: AHAHAHAHA... holy, holy, holy.. ahaha]
You, John Parker, the Sorcverer, have effectively tossed the game
pieces in the air in conjunction with cheating [which] is not only
evidence of amorality but stupidity.
PD
ahahaha... More!... More!... More of this!. *** physics!
You guys' stuff is much, much better.... ahahahaha.....
Thanks for the laughs!
ahahaha... ahahanson
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- References:
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: cnctut
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: cnctut
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: cnctut
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: cnctut
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: cnctut
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: PD
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: PD
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: hanson
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- From: PD
- Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- Prev by Date: Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- Next by Date: Re: Is my friend full of BS?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- Next by thread: Re: Are physics cranks employed?
- Index(es):