Re: RBMK reactor low power instability. Chernobyl
- From: "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:44:17 GMT
"Martin Hogbin" <goatREMOVETHIS123@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:kI6dndJc29pnVm3ZRVnyqQ@xxxxxxxxx
|
| "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0I3Ig.63846$fV1.63824@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| > "Chris" <chrisvine9@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:1156627361.972820.284270@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | Hi, New to this group so hope not to go over previous ground.
| > |
| > | I am interested in the power surge which destroyed the rbmk reactor at
| > | Chernobyl. Have read up a lot on the web and understand (I hope) the
| > | following:
| > |
| > | There was a strong positive void coefficient in the reactor design
| > |
| > | At the time of the test the control rods were pulled out too far and
| > | their design increased the reactivity as they were lowered because the
| > | neutron aborbing water was displaced.
| > |
| > | That the reason that the control rods had to be pulled out so far was
| > | because of Xenon poisoning following the previous higher power levels
| > |
| > | That most of the safety systems were disabled.
| > |
| > | That there are something like 6 concurrent equations describing the
| > | reactivity.
| > |
| > | However on almost every description of the accident the reactor is
| > | described as unstable at low power outputs. What I have not seen
| > | explained is why the instability is worse at low outputs than at high
| > | outputs.
| > |
| > | Is there an explanation which can make sense to a good physics
(school)
| > | student and a mechanical engineer?!
| > |
| > | Thanks in advance
| > | Chris.
| >
| > Yes.
| > As an analogy, think of a puncture in a bus tyre. One tiny hole
| > can cause the tyre to deflate, the bus becomes unstable, the
| > driver loses control and the occupants are killed. The reason
| > for the puncture was the tyre was under inflated and that
| > caused the tyre wall to flex more than usual.
| >
| > Nuclear reactors are designed to produce energy in quantity.
| > Running such a system below it's minimum rated output results
| > in the core not having sufficient cooling, hot spots develop.
| > While the reactor as a whole is at a common temperature all is fine,
| > but when it is too cool a hotspot causes local distortion from
| > thermal expansion because (perhaps) one control rod was not all
| > the way in. Once one spot has melted it's all over, out of control.
| > Androcles
|
| Sorcerer/Androcles is a well known crackpot in this group.
| Ignore him.
|
| Martin Hogbin
Pigbin is a well known one-sentence troll in this newsgroup
who does not know how to measure the speed of a train.
Listen to him and decide for yourself.
Androcles
.
- References:
- RBMK reactor low power instability. Chernobyl
- From: Chris
- Re: RBMK reactor low power instability. Chernobyl
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: RBMK reactor low power instability. Chernobyl
- From: Martin Hogbin
- RBMK reactor low power instability. Chernobyl
- Prev by Date: Re: Do we know if gravity pushes or pulls?
- Next by Date: Re: The people who walked on the moon know it's health hazards.
- Previous by thread: Re: RBMK reactor low power instability. Chernobyl
- Next by thread: Re: RBMK reactor low power instability. Chernobyl
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading